Australian broadcaster humiliates climate zealots

And not a lie was said (at least by him).

The questions I have are…

1. Why the war on farmers?
2. What is being done to address the oxygen “poisoning” being done to our plant life globally (as Carbon Dioxide is reduced)?
3. Who is behind this false narrative of catastrophism known as climate change?
4. What is the end goal?

quote:

---

“Alice” on stage with him acts so typical leftist in her efforts to avoid facts and accountability. Doesn’t want to talk about facts as she has none.

---

Prior to him owning her with a simple question, she was dismissive and condescending. She is a good little goose-stepper.

You saw that cow sitting next to him. When presented with facts, they stick their heads in the sand and say I’m not a scientist. They don’t care about facts.

Leaving this here...

For those who didn't watch, his points were that:

*.04% of the atmosphere is made up of CO2
*humans are responsible for 3%
*of that 3%, Australia is responsible for 1%

The alarmist clergy attempt to counterpoint that the 3% is actually ~33%, except what they are saying is that the amount has increased by 33% since 1850 and that humans are responsible for all of it. Another counterpoint is the percentage in the atmosphere isn't the important point, but rather that the total amount is the point.

All that said, what's interesting is that when you dig down into molecular heat-trapping, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) beats the shite out of CO2. SF6 traps around 22,000 times more heat than CO2 and has a far longer lifespan. SF6 occurs at only 1 part per trillion, but it has been steadily increasing over the years.



Unlike CO2 though, SF6 is completely man-made (it doesn't naturally occur). What's it's primary use? To insulate electrical parts and switch the flow of current, meaning it's also used in wind turbines.

In a nutshell, the single most heat-trapping greenhouse gas in the world is man-made and used primarily for the electrical expansion that the green crowd is saying will save us from overheating the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.

Carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant. It is a trace atmospheric gas REQUIRED for life as we know it to exist on this planet.

If anything, a little too little CO2 would be a much bigger problem than a little too much.

quote:

---

“Alice” on stage with him acts so typical leftist in her efforts to avoid facts and accountability. Doesn’t want to talk about facts as she has none.

---

She’s doing what leftists do, which is using emotion instead of logic. In this case she does the silly dismissive laugh.

quote:

---

That 0.04% slice of CO2 looks small, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be impactful.

---

True.

It needs to be a larger slice.

Prost!