- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:42 am to smh4wg
I’m living proof ivermectin works and works extremely well. I’ll go with my own study instead.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:43 am to Penrod
quote:
The data is overwhelming that if you have no natural immunity, and you want to medicate to avoid covid’s worst outcomes, you should get vaccinated. Your chances would improve by about 6300%, and the side effects are either very mild or extraordinarily rare.
You’re only off by 6260%. Other than that, good post from the limp dick.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:44 am to smh4wg
Will ivermectin give 16 year olds heart attacks?
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:45 am to Jake88
quote:
the results were positive, you'd be all over this study.
The numbers say it is positive.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:47 am to Penrod
quote:
The data is overwhelming that if you have no natural immunity, and you want to medicate to avoid covid’s worst outcomes, you should get vaccinated. Your chances would improve by about 6300%, and the side effects are either very mild or extraordinarily rare.
All of this is a lie, and you continue to be the most stupid person that posts on these boards.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:48 am to Open Your Eyes
He’s not the most stupid. He does lie to himself the most.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:48 am to smh4wg
And yet it is considered a good therapeutic by many physicians and Louisiana has a cartel of rebellious doctors willing to prescribe and pharmacists willing to sell the cheap 2 dollar drug, because big box stores won't allow it and the state board has gone out of its way to stop physicians from using it.
Hmmmmm.
Hmmmmm.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 9:48 am
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:48 am to smh4wg
It’s like hcq.
Doctors really fricked up here. Well it doesn’t work when the person is already dead.
No shite.
Doctors really fricked up here. Well it doesn’t work when the person is already dead.
No shite.
quote:
382 HCQ COVID-19 studies, 286 peer reviewed, 314 comparing treatment and control groups. HCQ is not effective when used very late with high dosages over a long period (RECOVERY/SOLIDARITY), effectiveness improves with earlier usage and improved dosing. Early treatment consistently shows positive effects. Negative evaluations typically ignore treatment time, often focusing on a subset of late stage studies.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 8:50 am
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:49 am to smh4wg
I took Ivermectin..... the only thing I didn't like was being put in the squeeze chute to take it.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:50 am to smh4wg
Trust Malaysian science.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:51 am to Penrod
quote:
6300%,
WOW! That’s amazing!!
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:15 am to smh4wg
There’s a massive nation wide study of over 15,000 patients at numerous facilities being directed by Duke currently. Sometime later this year we’ll have an unmatched study on this topic in terms of size and design.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 9:16 am
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:17 am to smh4wg
quote:
5% less effective against severe disease than standard of care.
Standard of care is nothing.
I see they only used ivermectin. No zinc, d3, pepcid, or anything else, just ivermectin alone.
JAMA
Haven’t read the study….was ivermectin administered after the patient was hospitalized or was it administered as a prophylactic or within a few days of diagnosis? If ivermectin was given after the virus was already causing severe infection I would agree with the study because that’s the same data the other ivermectin deniers have released citing other studies, they did they same with HCQ.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:23 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Sometime later this year
Lol
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:26 am to MrKnowItAll
quote:
the only thing I didn't like was being put in the squeeze chute to take it.
shite gives you gas like a mofo too.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:28 am to smh4wg
Wrong. I’ve proved it effective four times so far. Don’t fall for fake “ studies”.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:35 am to Bridget O
Yeah, the conclusions don’t support the data, which is why they led with the 02 saturation in the design. If I rephrase the data as to which group I wanted to be in and said “ Do you want to be in the group where only 3 died, or the group where 10 died?”. I think most people with severe risk would say, 3…..which is the Ivermectin group. I know the stats were small, but crazy conclusions to this study which seems to look for a reason instead of what’s important to individual patients cutting the risks of dying, which should be the lead….
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:36 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
There’s a massive nation wide study of over 15,000 patients at numerous facilities being directed by Duke currently. Sometime later this year we’ll have an unmatched study on this topic in terms of size and design.
Is there a test to determine how sick the patient is in terms of viral load? The point I’m trying to make is if someone is infected with a viral load of 500 million and ivermectin can handle 200 million and the patients immune system can handle 300 million then it looks like ivermectin works. On the other hand if the patient can only handle 100 million then it looks like ivermectin is a failure.
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News