Started By
Message

re: LSU Basketball Recruiting Thread: 2024 (And Beyond)

Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
342 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

but there are unspoken rules in a locker room and there is usually a pecking order on the team. this is abundantly clear if you've ever played a sport at any level above elementary or middle school


well tough guy congrats on being an athlete.

everything has a pecking order or hierarchy. its not based on who pays tuition and there is no reason to think the coach cares about that.

quote:

i think it's very silly to suggest that baker being recruited to be a focal point of the team


who said he was the focal point?

quote:

he received a scholarship (when dean didn't) had zero impact on his playing time


again you have shown zero evidence of the relationship between scholarships and restricted or enhanced playing time.

quote:

i think it's very silly...it's crazy


this is a fallacy called appeal to incredulity. you find it really crazy. hard to believe. good for you. no evidence other than you saying its wild or crazy to think otherwise.

Posted by mcmaniacinsaneasylum
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2023
1976 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

I don't think you know either. the idea that minutes would be restricted based on who pays for the scholarship directly and who uses NIL money seems unsupported by evidence and unlikely.


I disagree. Up until the point I found out that Dean wasn't on scholarship I was questioning a lot about McMahon and his ability to make lineups and rotations. Finding out Dean wasn't on scholarship answered a lot of my questions. If you cannot come to the same conclusions, that is on you. Agree to disagree.

quote:

I think baker proved to be too poor of an athlete. couldn't rebound. wasn't making enough shots to justify his minutes. so dean got more minutes.


It was painfully obvious where his game was lacking, yet he still played over Dean in many critical situations... most egregious of so was SECT against Miss St.

Can you provide an explanation for why this might be?

I can, it's the scholarship situation. Either that or McMahon can't evaluate talent...and I'd like to go with the former as I don't think he's that bad of a coach.

quote:

again you have shown zero evidence of the relationship between scholarships and restricted or enhanced playing time.


What other explanation is there for Baker playing over Dean when anyone and everyone who watched our team last year came around to thinking Dean deserved more minutes? Either McMahon can't see what a basketball layman can see or locker room politics and the scholarship situation played a part.

Also, I did provide evidence. I gave other examples of McMahon's locker room politics to apply it to the situation of Dean and Baker.

quote:

100% of the home games for many years. listen to every coaches show, read everything possible. sometimes drive to Nashville. I even go to mcneese games to think about what wade meant to the program. I notice the things you mention, the attitude from cook etc.


I'm genuinely glad I'm not the only one.


quote:

everything has a pecking order or hierarchy. its not based on who pays tuition and there is no reason to think the coach cares about that.


Yes everything has a hierarchy. Sports is no different. I disagree however that there is no evidence to suggest this. McMahon is quite clearly very old school. He favors seniority but has also shown a tendency to play favorites. I can make the connection between this and the scholarship situation. If you can't, that's on you- and we'll have to agree to disagree.

quote:

who said he was the focal point?


He quite clearly was from how he was talked about and the scheme that was in place the first few games of the season until we realized it wasn't going to work. He got exposed by Nicholls.

quote:

again you have shown zero evidence of the relationship between scholarships and restricted or enhanced playing time.


I think I have.
"Shouldn't the coach play the best players"
Yes. Dean is better than Baker, but Baker played more.... now like I said previously I'd like for you to explain to me why that is.

quote:

this is a fallacy called appeal to incredulity. you find it really crazy. hard to believe. good for you. no evidence other than you saying its wild or crazy to think otherwise.


It's not really a fallacy of incredulity when I provided evidence as to why I feel the way I do. The sentence before I said "it's crazy" was literally evidence as to why I feel that way, but yet I provide zero evidence. Ok.
Posted by mcmaniacinsaneasylum
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2023
1976 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

again you have shown zero evidence


People like who you use this as their main argument are some of my least favorite people to argue with on TD and are far too common on here. You do realize there is a difference between a fallacy ridden argument with no evidence and an argument that you simply disagree with the evidence provided? Just because you disagree with what someone is saying does not mean they provided no evidence. It simply means you disagree with the evidence they provided.

It is a fallacy on its own to base your entire argument on “you have no evidence” and to dismiss an argument on “you committed xyz fallacy”

Is it possible that you skimmed over my post and glanced over the evidence I provided? Or is it that you simply ignore the evidence to fit your narrative?

quote:

who said he was the focal point?


Let me provide “evidence” as to why baker was the focal point. He was recruited in a schematic sense to be the replacement for KJ Williams. A big man that provided offensive consistency and could stretch the floor. A similar pitch was provided to both him and Jordan Wright because they were both role players at their previous school. McMahon offered them a big role in a P6 program for their final year.

Baker’s play style on the court had a negative impact on MULTIPLE players on our roster. Despite this, he still played a good bit and still played from the same spots on the court until a few games into SEC play.

This raises the question, what exactly is Baker’s style of play? Posting up from both the high post and low post. Playing the weak side to get the ball passed to from drive and kicks. This playstyle contributed to a lack of space on the court, a black hole when he received the ball, and an unwillingness/inability to set screens on and off the ball. Now let’s discuss how this impacted players negatively.

Carlos Stewart- probably the biggest victim of bakers playstyle imo. Carlos at SC operated a lot from the top of the arc and at the elbow. He also drove into the paint and scored with a variety of finishing moves. He couldn’t do any of this however with Baker posting up for 15 seconds of the shot clock and his role being reduced to an off ball player.

Jalen Reed- a player who’s best offensive trait is inarguably scoring one on one driving from the perimeter to the paint. Couldn’t do so with Baker clogging down low though.

Jalen Cook- baker was terrible at PNR/PNP actions with him as he was not a genuine roll threat and not good enough of a shooter. (I wonder who was though)

Tyrell Ward- Baker never set him any off ball screens to help him get open

Now despite all of these glaring issues and the negative impact it had on offensive efficiency and team chemistry he was still allowed to operate in the same manner for well over half the season. Sure it worked at times, but McMahon failed to pull the plug on games where baker was just a flat out non factor. To me this is indicative that he was supposed to be a focal point of the team on the offensive side, especially when you consider the sacrifices other players had to make to allow him to play his game.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 4:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram