Started By
Message

re: Who we picking at 8?

Posted on 5/19/22 at 8:55 am to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166500 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 8:55 am to
quote:

IMO he's more of a sixth man type of player.


which we don't really have that 6th man creator type.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Yeah, IMO he's more of a sixth man type of player.

That's a big reason why I am in his corner for our team. He seems to be a potential great lead guard for the 2nd unit to pair with Trey and Jax (and likely Zion for stretches). I think he could eventually develop into a CJ-level lead guy when CJ retires in a few years.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32737 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:06 am to
quote:

That's a big reason why I am in his corner for our team. He seems to be a potential great lead guard for the 2nd unit to pair with Trey and Jax (and likely Zion for stretches).
My concern there is that I'm not sure is a great fit if the plan is to play Zion as the point guard with the second unit. Whereas I think someone like Griffin or Mathurin would fit in that scenario almost seamlessly as an offball shooting to compliment Zion. On the other end of the floor, I think Sochhan would fit great next to Zion to be able to guard the opposing team's best player when Zion is out there with the second unit.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38918 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:08 am to
i dont think theres a wrong answer (other than the likelihood of one or more of these guys going bust). pels will have a choice of 2-4 legitimate NBA prospects they can add to the team
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:10 am to
quote:

My concern there is that I'm not sure is a great fit if the plan is to play Zion as the point guard with the second unit.

Zion needs that 2nd ballhandler/creator, like BI with CJ.

quote:

Whereas I think someone like Griffin or Mathurin would fit in that scenario almost seamlessly as an offball shooting to compliment Zion.

But we already kind of have that guy in Trey. Mathurin is my #2 so I'm not opposed to him, but I think his defense keeps him off the court (and is a major red flag with his personality, generally)
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32737 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:18 am to
quote:

But we already kind of have that guy in Trey.

True, and we also have a versatile defender similar to what Sochan brings in Herb, but I'm not opposed to having multiple of those types of players.
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14946 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Mathurin is my #2 so I'm not opposed to him, but I think his defense keeps him off the court (and is a major red flag with his personality, generally)


And to kind of piggy back off this, I would always bank on a bad shooter to become at least an average shooter rather than a poor defender to become an average defender.

So if it was out of taking say Sochan or Daniels and taking the chance on them developing their shots, or taking Mathurin and taking the chance on him developing his defense, that’s an easy choice.

Plus it’s been proven time and time again you can add shooters later in the first, in the second, or even on the undrafted market.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166500 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:24 am to
quote:


And to kind of piggy back off this, I would always bank on a bad shooter to become at least an average shooter rather than a poor defender to become an average defender.

So if it was out of taking say Sochan or Daniels and taking the chance on them developing their shots, or taking Mathurin and taking the chance on him developing his defense, that’s an easy choice.

Plus it’s been proven time and time again you can add shooters later in the first, in the second, or even on the undrafted market.



Does Herb and Jose prove we can add elite defense in the 2nd and undrafted?
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38918 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:24 am to
Johnny Davis seems to check the most boxes within that line of thinking
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14946 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:31 am to
quote:

True, and we also have a versatile defender similar to what Sochan brings in Herb, but I'm not opposed to having multiple of those types of players.


I talked about it yesterday but if you look at the teams still playing they all have 7-8 guys who are high level versatile defenders. This isn’t in regards to you obviously, but I have seen people on this board say adding more defenders like Herb is redundant which is just a ridiculous statement.

Those teams have 7-8, we have what? 3 or 4? We are going to add more guys like that, that’s not even a question.
Posted by YungBuck
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2017
1776 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:36 am to
Agreed, one reason I’m okay taking Sochan or Daniels, or even trading back to the #11-13 range to get Ochai Agbaji while offloading one of Temple or Graham
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34488 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:53 am to
quote:

or even trading back to the #11-13 range


For the sanity of people on this board, I pray we don't trade back. "What ifs" become much much worse when you trade back.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38918 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:01 am to
quote:

For the sanity of people on this board, I pray we don't trade back

no doubt
just wait and see the melt when they discard the two 2nds; a trade back would not be well received
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14946 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Does Herb and Jose prove we can add elite defense in the 2nd and undrafted?


You could potentially get lucky and add almost anything in the 2nd round. 2x MVP Nikola Jokic was a 2nd rounder, 4x All-NBA first team and 2017 NBA defensive player of the year Draymond Green was a 2nd rounder...so on and so on.

But in terms of actual realistic expectations, you're much more likely to find a shooter/scorer in the 2nd round then anything else. If you look at the last decade (excluding this season because not enough guys have had the opportunity to establish themselves) I found 32 guards/wings that I would classify as being "second round steals."

Of those 32, I would say 22 of them outplayed their draft selection because they're good shooters or good scorers. Then 5 of them are quasi All-Stars or All-Star caliber players. The other 5 are guys that I would classify as playing mostly because they're just very good defensively.

The reasoning for this? I would say you're more unlikely to find a guy that's good defensively but also good enough offensively to justify playing that guy. The extreme example (and this guy wasn't a 2nd rounder) is Matisse Thybulle. Excellent defender, but such a negative offensively his role diminished throughout the season.

Herb and Jose are the exceptions, not the rules.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166500 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:30 am to
I still think our team is in need of elite shooting. We have players that we hope can improve when Zion returns and a couple we have eyes on that we hope continue development but we have to have elite shooting around zion for our squad to hit max potential in the near future.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278717 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Daniels just posted some elite numbers in the drills.


What drills & what numbers

ETA Nevermind just saw. Impressive for sure.
This post was edited on 5/19/22 at 10:41 am
Posted by Poichess
Member since Jun 2019
796 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:47 am to
Did he measure 6’8”?
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10476 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:51 am to
6-7 1/2 with shoes. Could still continue to grow in the next year or 2.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25808 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 11:08 am to
The more i think about it, the more i think it's important to draft someone with a heavy influence on how they fit the culture of the team. guys that seem to not care about playing defense are guys i don't really want, and Mathurin kind of fits that, and he's who i've been wanting for quite some time. There's nothing that destroys team defense than someone who just gives piss poor effort to get through and around screens, and that's a big knock on him.

I'm liking Johnny Davis more and more at #8. And i still think Branham is a sleeper that goes in the early teens and if he interviews really well, i like him a lot and wouldn't mind moving down a few spots to get him, even though i can't stand the idea of ever moving down in the draft.
I think Ochai is a very safe pick with a high floor low ceiling.


Dare i say, even though i've said many many times it's dumb to trade down in the nba draft, that we move to #13 and #15 from Charlotte for #8 if we can get Branham and Williams there?

Posted by greewe
Member since Jul 2019
169 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 11:17 am to
quote:

For the sanity of people on this board, I pray we don't trade back. "What ifs" become much much worse when you trade back.


I generally agree with that, but the Pels did really well moving back last year. Trey was their guy, and they knew they could get him at 17, so they traded back. It looks brilliant in hindsight.

For example, if Dieng is their target this year and they have intel leading up to the draft that they can get him at 12, could you send 8 to OKC and pick up more draft capital down the line to move back and still take their target guy?

Just a hypothetical, but I see some situations where trading back from 8 could make some sense if everything goes a certain way like it did last year.
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram