Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

When the new SEC TV contract takes effect, every SEC school is set to make around $40M/yr

Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:10 pm
Posted by SeekGreatness
Member since Nov 2015
3489 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:10 pm
Just from TV money.

LINK

Don’t tell me McMahon won’t be fired bc of the buyout.

This post was edited on 2/18/23 at 8:11 pm
Posted by UnoMe
Here
Member since Dec 2007
5605 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:15 pm to
McManhon won’t be fired bc of buyout.
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
21249 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:15 pm to
Did you really need your own thread to post this? Couldn't you have just kept it in the one you already posted it in?


Here's the attention you are seeking I guess.
Posted by MrWalkingMan
31st Parallel North
Member since Aug 2010
6422 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:16 pm to
Didn’t we make 49 million this year from that exact thing?
Posted by SeekGreatness
Member since Nov 2015
3489 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:16 pm to
TBH I thought it was a little under $19m a year until I looked this up. $40M a year is an even bigger deal, so there’s that.
Posted by SeekGreatness
Member since Nov 2015
3489 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Didn’t we make 49 million this year from that exact thing?


No, currently the entire SEC makes $44m in Tv money, this is $40m per sec school
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
5707 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

When the new SEC TV contract takes effect, every SEC school is set to make around $40M/yr

Can some that money be used to buy 5 starters.
Posted by Tom Bronco
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2011
2655 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 11:14 pm to
For Fiscal Year 2021 the Athletic Dept. had a 9.6 million dollar deficit. How they financed that debt I don't know. For Fiscal Year 2022 they had a 1.94 million surplus. Expenses are eye opening. The university spent $192.8 million on total operating expenses in the 2022 fiscal year, $61.2 million more than in 2021, $37.2 million more than in 2020 and $43.8 million more than in 2019, according to the documents.

So if the buyout money is there it will take more TAF donations. The rest of the money already seems to be spoken for with current expenses.
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13131 posts
Posted on 2/18/23 at 11:41 pm to
For 21-22 each SEC school got $49.9 million from the SEC media deals. The new media deal with ABC-ESPN is supposed to bring us much more per school even with 16 schools in 2024.
Posted by Kat Kat
Member since Aug 2017
189 posts
Posted on 2/19/23 at 7:02 am to
So you link an article from 2021?
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
7577 posts
Posted on 2/19/23 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Don’t tell me McMahon won’t be fired bc of the buyout

I'd rather we keep him and spend the money on upgrades to the Box and PMAC. We keep spending all this money on coaches and we'll never improve the facilities
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
8020 posts
Posted on 2/19/23 at 8:11 am to
Do you think that LSU athletics has no expenses?
Posted by Tom Bronco
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2011
2655 posts
Posted on 2/19/23 at 7:41 pm to
You obviously didn't read my post. There were numbers for fiscal year 2022 also. Since fiscal year 2023 hasn't closed out yet there are no numbers available yet. Sometimes a fiscal year does not use a calendar year and some educational institutions will go from Sept. - Aug. I don't know what LSU uses for a fiscal year. And did you notice the 9.6 million loss they have to cover?
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
24668 posts
Posted on 2/20/23 at 6:51 am to
Brings good news





Makes it a basketball bitch session
Posted by Imber
Member since Sep 2017
12998 posts
Posted on 2/20/23 at 6:56 am to
quote:

The university spent $192.8 million on total operating expenses in the 2022 fiscal year, $61.2 million more than in 2021, $37.2 million more than in 2020 and $43.8 million more than in 2019, according to the documents.


Meaning regardless of how much is coming in, they are going to find a way to spend it to keep up in the SEC arms race.

quote:

So if the buyout money is there it will take more TAF donations. The rest of the money already seems to be spoken for with current expenses.


Correct. And I'm as pissed off as the next fan, but no coach worth a damn is going to come here if we fire McMahon after one season.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30465 posts
Posted on 2/20/23 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Don’t tell me McMahon won’t be fired bc of the buyout.
what if I told you that he won’t be fired, and that we DO have the buyout money?



You act as if we only have a bbcoach budget when the arena he coaches in is in need of renovation or tear-down.












Oh. And we have no talent.

This post was edited on 2/20/23 at 7:24 am
Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
3300 posts
Posted on 2/20/23 at 9:32 am to
Other GOOD coaches aren't blind, and won't be scared off by firing McMahon after one year. Any objective observer can determine that McMahon has vastly underperformed, even given the circumstances he took over.

If McMahon (and the program) were just showing a faint heartbeat, and ANYTHING that showed promise for the future, no reasonable person would be questioning his job status at all.

This guy has shown NOTHING to give ANYONE ANYTHING to be optimistic about as far as this program is concerned. That is a major problem.

If the funds are truly available with the new TV deals, Woodward needs to swallow his pride and cut bait with McMahon. My first choice would be Beard or Wade. Another poster mentioned Donovan. I'd be thrilled with him, but don't know he'd be interested.

Simpletons on here accuse me and other posters of loving Wade, or defending a MONSTER (completely unproven) like Beard. That is bullspit. I want WHOEVER IT IS to maximize what LSU can be in basketball. IMO, that is AT LEAST what Baylor is doing. I've witnessed success like that in the past in BR. It's not as farfetched as some of you seem to think.
Posted by LSUDAN1
Member since Oct 2010
9001 posts
Posted on 2/20/23 at 9:49 am to
He should be fired for a moral clause. It is morally weong to accept payment for such a shiity job.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram