Started By
Message
Best vs deserved
Posted on 12/7/23 at 1:32 am
Posted on 12/7/23 at 1:32 am
Do people not understand that the committee uses a combination of best and deserved to pick the “best” 4 teams. It’s not best vs deserved, it’s a combination of both. You had 5 conference champions this year all with 1 loss or undefeated. 5 teams that earned it on the field so the committee picked what they felt were the best 4 out of those 5 deserving teams. Sure Georgia is probably one of the best 4 teams, but they didn’t meet the threshold of deserving this year without having that conference championship like the other 5 teams. The only question was FSU vs Alabama and they felt Alabama was better. And the injury to Jordan Travis gave them an easy out to put in Alabama.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 4:24 am to tigereye1988
Best vs Most Deserved
“Best”
1. Michigan
2. Texas
3. Bama
4. UGA
5. Washington
6. Ohio State
7. FSU
“Most Deserving”
1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. FSU
4. Texas
5. Bama
6. UGA
7. Ohio St
“Best”
1. Michigan
2. Texas
3. Bama
4. UGA
5. Washington
6. Ohio State
7. FSU
“Most Deserving”
1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. FSU
4. Texas
5. Bama
6. UGA
7. Ohio St
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:02 am to tigereye1988
quote:
The only question was FSU vs Alabama and they felt Alabama was better.
What about FSU vs Texas, another one loss conference champion?
I've heard people say that the committee couldn't put Bama in over Texas, but after this year, I think the committee can do whatever it wants.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:18 am to tigereye1988
Sorry, sir, 24-hour Outrage Mob has moved on. No one cares anymore.
This post was edited on 12/7/23 at 8:20 am
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:27 am to tigereye1988
Can we stop with this already?
It’s getting old.
It’s getting old.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 8:30 am to tigereye1988
quote:
And the injury to Jordan Travis
I remember a starting qb about five years ago who led his team to a 13-0 deficit after the first half, who was then replaced by the second string qb for the second half and this second-stringer eventually won the national championship.
Second string qbs can win ball games you know.
This post was edited on 12/7/23 at 8:35 am
Posted on 12/7/23 at 9:52 am to tigereye1988
Instead of trying to come up with different adjectives and perspectives on the CFP committee, I don't understand why people on here just look at trends instead. The CFP Committe has been around for 10 frigging years now. After a while trends emerge. That's why I knew Georgia had no shot after the SECCG.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 10:05 am to tigereye1988
quote:
Do people not understand that the committee uses a combination of best and deserved to pick the “best” 4 teams.
Well Florida St. Was both so.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News