Started By
Message

re: How do y’all see us finishing on the hardwood? (Men’s)

Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:46 am to
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73548 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:46 am to
Fall short of the NIT and about the same next season.
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
5060 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:48 am to
quote:

LSU vs McNeese in the first round. Y


McNeese will probably win their conference tourny and be in the NCAA tourney
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
42020 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Tenn - L Bama - L @UF - W @USC - L UK - L


Tough stretch, indeed

Winning 1 of those will be tough
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
1896 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:59 am to
AL and KY are winnable at home if they play like they did against ARK. FL and SC will be extremely tough on the road.
Posted by TopWaterTiger
Lake Charles, LA
Member since May 2006
10224 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:10 am to
quote:

NIT is a reasonable goal. I am hesitant to read too much into this win because Arkansas is such a mess right now, so it's more about getting better individually and collectively and the upcoming games will give us a much better idea if we are really getting that or not.


Yep. NIT would be good after the dumpster fire of last year.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40859 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:16 am to
I think .500 is the ceiling for this team. Maybe NIT, but I'm not 100% on that. The back end of SEC play is going to be tough for them. Not many W's in what's left.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28470 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:31 am to
quote:

The back end of SEC play is going to be tough for them. Not many W's in what's left


Actually, the "backend" is pretty favorable with home games vs. Georgia, Mississippi St, and Missouri, and road games at Vanderbilt and Arkansas. It's really this 5 game stretch starting on Wednesday that is the gauntlet. Can LSU get a game or two during that stretch? If so, ANY of them will be a big win.

Last season McMahon couldn't beat anyone in SEC play. Good or bad. This year LSU has done a relatively good job of winning the games they are "supposed" to win. The next step in the progression is winning some games they are "not supposed" to win. There are 5 opportunities to do so staring them in the face right now.
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26340 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Both are winnable at home

No, sir. Kentucky is more possible than Bama, as they have injuries and have been slumping. Bama is a team on a mission. They appear to be the strongest team in the SEC, notwithstanding the Tenn loss.
Posted by Pnels08
Member since Jul 2014
9181 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:53 am to
I got us at 4-6.


We have got to beat Mizzou/Ark/Vandy.

Ark will be a dead team by the time we get there , Stackhouse should be saying his goodbyes by the time we play Vandy and Mizzou just sucks.

I think we are better than UGA and we played piss poor at UGA so we should be able to defend home court.

I like our chances vs State at home but they are such a bad matchup for LSU idk if I can predict LSU winning that one.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28470 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:53 am to
quote:

No, sir. Kentucky is more possible than Bama


Agreed

quote:

They appear to be the strongest team in the SEC, notwithstanding the Tenn loss.


I'm not ready to go there JUST yet. No doubt they are very good. At worst, top 4 in the SEC. But they've had a relatively favorable SEC schedule (to date). Their road games have been: @ Vanderbilt, MSU, Tenn., Georgia. Tennessee blew them out by 20. They won the other road games, but all were by less than 10. At home they've played South Carolina, Missouri, LSU, Auburn and MSU. They dominated every opponent except Auburn. Point being, they are a different team on the road. This week they are at Auburn.

I still think at their best Tennessee and Auburn are more complete teams than Alabama. It's just that when Alabama's offense gets rolling (because of their style of play) they can blow open a game in a hurry.

Outside of poor FT shooting, LSU's offense at Alabama wasn't terrible (though not great). LSU shot nearly 40% from three. They also limited the TOs to 10 (which for LSU is very good). It's just that LSU's defense was poor. Part of that may have been McMahon's decision to try to run with Alabama. I know McMahon wants to play uptempo. I like it. It's a fun style to watch when it is working. But sometimes you have to use discretion. And playing that style plays right into Alabama's hands. It will be interesting to see if he makes an adjustment next Saturday.
Posted by BayouWolf
Member since Dec 2009
255 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:07 pm to
As many have said, they have been very competitive in almost every game. NCAAT is a massive long shot but from a program perspective would be awesome to see a W against 1 of Tenn, Bama and UK.

The profile looks drastically different if they don’t lose back to back games against Nicholls (crippling quad 4 loss) and Dayton (missed top 20 quad 1 win) on buzzer beaters. Let alone 1 possession losses vs A&M and UGA. We are close but also very far away from bubble.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14544 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

The next step in the progression


Again, I'm a broken record, but that's what I want to see....progression. Getting better, improving, and developing both individually and collectively.

For me this is without question the main thing I'm looking at and for.

Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56495 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

@Tenn - L
Bama - L
@UF - W
@USC - L
UK - L
State - W
UGA - W
@Vandy - W
@Ark - W
Mizzou - L


9 and 9...but could end up 7-11 or 11 and 7.

Just depends if we figure out how to rebound and quit giving stupid fouls.
Posted by Luckydog
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2018
330 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:29 pm to
At best we finish 4-6
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
1896 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:36 pm to
We played with AL for 3 qtrs on the road. Statistically we were about even. Sears was the difference. Plus our lousy FT shooting and their 23 assists is where the game was lost. Other than that we competed evenly everywhere else. AL is beatable at home. So is Ky, GA and Miss St. If we can steal one of TN, FL or SC then we will have an opportunity to have a very good season and possibly a post season.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28470 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:40 pm to
It will be interesting to see if the game last Saturday was a byproduct of some rest/self-scouting that led to better play or just an anomaly where some guys shot lights out against an opponent seemingly coming apart at the seams.

For Baker, the 3's he made have been there all season. He just wasn't making them. Hopefully Saturday gave him some confidence because him being a true threat from 3 can really open up the floor and 3 assist.

I also liked the decision to start Hannibal. Cook is LSU's second leading scorer. But he hasn't been all that efficient in getting those points, and the offense wasn't making up for the bad defense/turnovers. On Saturday he had a "quiet" 20 points on just 5-8 shooting (3-5 from 3; 7-7 from the FT line) in just 21 minutes. Most importantly, he only had one turnover.

Tennessee is the best defensive team in the SEC and 2nd best in the nation. So I'm not expecting LSU to have a game like they did on Saturday. Not even close. But when LSU actually takes care of the ball they are not a terrible shooting team. Probably about on par with Tennessee (LSU's FG% is slightly better). The difference is Tenn. plays great defense and doesn't turn the ball over.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14544 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

For Baker, the 3's he made have been there all season. He just wasn't making them. Hopefully Saturday gave him some confidence because him being a true threat from 3 can really open up the floor and 3 assist.


Agreed, the 3's have been there all year - and passing opportunities have been there all year for him as well. If he can hit 3's at an above 35% clip the rest of the year and recognize the doubles coming and instead of dribbling into them pass to the open man quickly, he can add some dimes too and again, justify the PT he's been getting. I hope he does.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 2:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram