Started By
Message

re: Military Aircraft Gurus

Posted on 3/11/24 at 10:35 am to
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
15723 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 10:35 am to
quote:

I don't understand why we're buy more F-15s instead of just more F-35s.

The blowhard has no idea what he's talking about.
F-15EX's are serving two purposes.
1. Replacement of old arse F-15C/D's that several alert squadrons/national guard units use. They don't need F-35's and the EX's slide right into current mission sets whereas F-35's would require more training and MX setup.
2. F-15EX's work with the F-35's in a combat situation. F-35's can penetrate enemy air defenses and provide targeting info for the F-15EX's which are serving as missile trucks from a safe distance.

In the end, USAF is only buying 80 while they will acquire 3000 F-35's. It's just covering a temporary gap. The future state of air combat will be cheaper autonomous drones that fly alongside F-35's or NGAD. This will allow us to add far more capability for cheaper.
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1888 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 10:43 am to
quote:

jcaz

This guy gets it.

I will just add that the F-35 was never designed or imagined to be an air dominance aircraft; it is a strike platform. The F-22 is the air dominance fighter, but just like the B-2, we didn't get enough of them. So we are buying F-15EXs to augment F-22s in an air dominance role...especially for the homeland defense role since no adversary has a stealthy aircraft that can reach us.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram