- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fani wins
Posted on 3/15/24 at 6:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/15/24 at 6:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
It may not matter from a legal standpoint but I think it matters greatly from a voting standpoint. If by chance this case went to trial prior to the election and trump was hypothetically found guilty that could sway some number of independents.
0
Posted on 3/15/24 at 6:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
GA RICO statutory scheme
This guy. Lol.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 6:31 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
She has no business being in a court room. Anyone that thinks the judiciary is truly concerned with justice should stop that nonsense right now. The judiciary is in the pocket of Big Gov and it's been that way for a long time.
This needs repeated
Posted on 3/15/24 at 6:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I somewhat get the federal separation of powers argument, but a state prosecution wouldn't have those issues
In this post, SFP advances the theory that state or local court could prosecute a sitting President. “Cuz it’s not federal, man.”
Posted on 3/15/24 at 6:46 pm to Pettifogger
There’s nothing powerful about Fani Willis. Black people are entitled and spoiled because society allows this bullshite to go on.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:15 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Remember when you lied and claimed to be a conservative?
Yet, here you are, defending Fani.
Conservative means different things to different people. if you think maga is Conservative then I'm definitely not your definition of it.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:16 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
if you think maga is Conservative then I'm definitely not your definition of it.
You might conservative (relatively speaking) when you’re at your Marxist coffee shop. Or hanging about in the Tenderloin as you are wont to do.
Nowhere else.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:25 pm to the808bass
What’s so hilarious is that they’re all vegans in the tenderloin.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:32 pm to doya2
No her troubles are coming just wait and see.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 9:13 pm to Loganville Vols
quote:
No her troubles are coming just wait and see
quote:
Whoa Boy!
I just got my hands on a 23 page grievance filed against #FaniWillis with the State Bar of Georgia
It's very thorough and even has a table of contents citing the ethics rules she's alleged to have violated!
I'll share it as soon as I get permission, but it's a doozie
https://twitter.com/PhilHollowayEsq/status/1768802815777092025?t=PTeeU8Fu-YBMIzwT6tZoIw&s=19
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
this post, SFP advances the theory that state or local court could prosecute a sitting President. “Cuz it’s not federal, man.”
Not a serious post.
What law would permit the violation of Georgia's rights as a state?
I didn't think there is a federal prohibition, but if there is it's due a federal separation of powers issue. That constitutional hurdle does not exist for a state.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
Fani is going to jail.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:33 pm to LuckyTiger
Fani be tender...with my love
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not a serious post.
Correct. Yours wasn’t a serious post. You’re doing your omphaloskepsis again.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Supremacy clause. Plus as a practical matter, what the Office of the President could or would do is simply ignore the matter, or maybe ignore isn’t the best word, perhaps just decline to cooperate/participate…..because who’s gonna go pick up the President from the White House on a a Georgia extradition warrant (especially in this case, but that’s beside the point).
Bottom line is Georgia would have to make application probably directly to the Supremes, and as everyone knew would happen they would be swatted down and the matter is settled via jurisprudence for good. Law of the land. But how truly otherworldly poor decision making that would be on the part of GA state prosecutor when (1) they knew or should have known the outcome and (2) considering the now of-record derogation of this state office by no less than her own prior employee, what kinda of fool would double down that horrendously? They probably would, so you might actually be correct on those bases.
But I would hope at least just this once you acknowledge something so fundamental in the prediction of what would happen, and move on to some other argument.
Bottom line is Georgia would have to make application probably directly to the Supremes, and as everyone knew would happen they would be swatted down and the matter is settled via jurisprudence for good. Law of the land. But how truly otherworldly poor decision making that would be on the part of GA state prosecutor when (1) they knew or should have known the outcome and (2) considering the now of-record derogation of this state office by no less than her own prior employee, what kinda of fool would double down that horrendously? They probably would, so you might actually be correct on those bases.
But I would hope at least just this once you acknowledge something so fundamental in the prediction of what would happen, and move on to some other argument.
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 3/16/24 at 4:09 am to davyjones
quote:This.
Supremacy clause.
By and large, the Constitutional premise is that a sitting POTUS be left to do his job. The concept that a corrupt, partisan, misandric, racist DA could force the POTUS into court during his term is anathema to such a premise.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 4:30 am to CreoleTigerEsq
quote:quote:Here's the ruling. Read it.
Well ... let's see.
(1) The ruling accepts their f**kbuddy relationship existed
(2) Wade's billing is a matter of public record.
Were you unaware of that?
quote:As I said CreoleTigerEsq, the ruling accepts their f**kbuddy relationship existed, and Wade's billing is a matter of public record. Read that.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 4:53 am to SlowFlowPro
No it’s called a question. Don’t you tout yourself as a lawyer? Yikes.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 5:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But the issue is they didn't rely on enough documentation to get them.
Again, the out the trash judge used that doesn't stand up to any reasoned scrutiny.
Posted on 3/16/24 at 5:25 am to oklahogjr
quote:I hope your presumption that Willis has a thing to do with running this case is simply a dishonest troll effort.
Now all trump hasto contend with is this "low IQ haughty black woman".
The Soros-Prog DC apparat is running this thing, not Willis. That's obviously how you get the top-tier likes of John Floyd and Jeff DiSantis rubbing elbows with dummies such as Willis, Bradley, and Wade.
This post was edited on 3/16/24 at 5:26 am
Page 12 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News