Started By
Message

re: USAF plans to retire more A-10 Warthogs; “crippling” close air support capabilities

Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:17 am to
Posted by Le Tenia
Member since Feb 2015
4530 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:17 am to
So you are saying that you agree with the NDS that the A-10s should no longer be in the fleet?

2nd question: If so, wouldn't the A-10s be useful elsewhere if not in the Far East strategy?

Seems like we continue to weaken our defenses when we should be strengthening it. IMO, we are getting closer and closer each day. But, but the A-10s are expensive to maintain. It's much cheaper to fly the KIA (sorry, pun intended unfortunately) and this allows us to spend the money elsewhere like say, Ukraine?? Other military resources?? Our border defense??
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1888 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:22 am to
quote:

So you are saying that you agree with the NDS that the A-10s should no longer be in the fleet?



Yes. They are useless in a high-end fight against a near-peer/peer competitor.

quote:

If so, wouldn't the A-10s be useful elsewhere if not in the Far East strategy?


We can't even afford the things we need to meet the #1 priority in the NDS. Why would we then fund something that is a lower priority?

quote:

It's much cheaper to fly


Doesn't matter. If it is useless in our priority mission, then every dollar spent on it is a waste.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram