Started By
Message

re: Already seeing the arguments that UConn still can’t be a blueblood

Posted on 4/10/24 at 1:04 pm to
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30388 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

they were a 7 seed and are arguably the worst national champion of all time with the worst national championship coach ever. they were no where even remotely in the stratosphere of a championship level team. they finished 14th in kenpom AFTER winning 6 in a row to win the natty. basically impossible to do. respectfully, frick off

it's not their fault that they won. shite, it's absolutely sweet for them. doesn't mean it's not a lucky fricking run


Sorry Kansas is too shitty to not get upset time and time again, but you don't have to be mad. It is not a "lucky" run to beat the #1, #2, #3, and #4 seeds. They may have had a shitty Kenpom, but that team had win over 6 ranked teams in the regular season and 3 top 15 teams in the NCAAT. They finished 32-8, so they weren't complete shite.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36480 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 5:07 pm to
this has literally nothing to do with kansas who also got a lucky draw recently to get 8 seeded unc in the finals.

what exactly is your argument? that uconn under 3 different coaches (one of which who is objectively terrible) is doing something different than duke, kansas, kentucky, etc... to go 6-0 in the finals? that there's no luck involved?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram