- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for people that have watched Dune I and II, but haven't read the books.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 1:26 am to Brosef Stalin
Posted on 4/13/24 at 1:26 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
It makes sense to me but I'm comparing them to the Lynch movie
There are a shite ton of details in these movies directed straight at readers that movie watchers won't get after 5 viewings.
2
Posted on 4/14/24 at 5:51 am to Ham Solo
I feel like I would have been lost without the '84 version. The people I know who hadn't seen it were very lost. The talking intro from '84 plus the navigator scene help a lot.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 10:13 am to Ham Solo
quote:
There are a shite ton of details in these movies directed straight at readers that movie watchers won't get after 5 viewings.
You’re outlining this like a bad thing, when I would say this speaks to how great this movie is that both the masses can enjoy along without everything spoonfed directly to them as well as with people who understand and are interested in the lore feeling like the story accomplished the impossible task of filming the ideas/themes/plot of Dune.
Certainly that leads to some folks completely misunderstanding the point of Paul’s character at points, but atleast it doesn’t actively change the point of Paul’s character like the 84 version.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News