- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McNeese Transfer Portal MAKE IT STOP!!! And another!
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:05 pm to saintsfan22
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:05 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
He shouldn't put too much effort into it. Committee isn't giving a Southland team an at large bid
It's unlikely. Though I wouldn't say impossible. McNeese finished the season with a 56 NET ranking (it was higher at the time of the selection in March). You had teams like A&M, Washington St., South Carolina with NET's in the 40-50 range get at-large bids. With a better OOC schedule and in-conference dominance it wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility (though still unlikely)
1
Posted on 5/10/24 at 1:27 pm to Alt26
quote:
It's unlikely. Though I wouldn't say impossible. McNeese finished the season with a 56 NET ranking (it was higher at the time of the selection in March). You had teams like A&M, Washington St., South Carolina with NET's in the 40-50 range get at-large bids. With a better OOC schedule and in-conference dominance it wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility (though still unlikely)
A&m, Wazzu, and South Carolina are major conference teams. Indiana St got left out with a NET in the 30s and they're in a better conference than McNeese. McNeese probably wouldn't even be able to get a NET that high with all the anchors in their conference.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News