- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why weren’t the electors who attempted to give away Trump election votes in 2016 indicted?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:57 pm
quote:
In the 2016 United States presidential election, ten members of the Electoral College voted or attempted to vote for a candidate different from the ones to whom they were pledged.[1] Three of these votes were invalidated under the faithless elector laws of their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.[2][3][4] Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.[1]
LINK
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:05 pm to RaoulDuke504
Because no Republican prosecutor sought an indictment (because the Republican Party never does shite).
You're not going to talk the Left into playing fair.
You're not going to talk the Left into playing fair.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:27 pm to RaoulDuke504
Hillary lost more votes through fathless electors than trump did.
Not everything is a grand conspiracy.
Not everything is a grand conspiracy.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:29 pm to RaoulDuke504
None of the people charged today were faithless electors. These situations aren't similar.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:31 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
None of the people charged today were faithless electors. These situations aren't similar.
Yea they tried to certify Trump as the winner and Clinton’s gave Trump elector votes to others.
Completely different in no way trying to obtain the same results
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:33 pm to RaoulDuke504
Trump’s appointments to the DOJ didn’t do shite
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:33 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
Yea they tried to certify Trump as the winner and Clinton’s gave Trump elector votes to others.
I'm not sure what this means.
quote:
Completely different in no way trying to obtain the same results
That's exactly right. Completely different.
Two people walk into a bank. One man withdraws money. One man uses a gun and steals money. Same result but completely different.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:45 pm to RaoulDuke504
Faithless electors are different than fake electors
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News