- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:06 pm to Hobie101
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:06 pm to Hobie101
quote:
Seems like giving a president blanket immunity would be creating a new law,
First of all, it’s not blanket immunity. It’s immunity for official acts as president.
And it would follow what has been done with federal judges. And it would be limited to laws that don’t specify the president.
2
Posted on 4/25/24 at 3:35 pm to moneyg
quote:Who decides what's "official"? And how is the question brought to their attention?
First of all, it’s not blanket immunity. It’s immunity for official acts as president.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 4:03 pm to moneyg
quote:
First of all, it’s not blanket immunity. It’s immunity for official acts as president.
For example, Obama received immunity for droning known American citizens in another country without due process, but Trump is guilty of an "insurrection" for telling his supporters to peacefully protest.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News