- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:20 pm
If they would that would mean impeachment, which is the current process for charging presidents would be voided. Any DA/state could indict a president and force a trial. This would blow up the way presidents are dealt with by Congress. Biden could be indicted by a red state DA right now and be forced to stand trial while in office .
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:21 pm to da prophet
quote:
If they would that would mean impeachment, which is the current process for charging presidents would be voided.
Clearly someone hasn't read the actual Constitution
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:27 pm to da prophet
quote:
SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
You are correct.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:35 pm to da prophet
It sounds like they are going to make a distinction between private and official acts by the president.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:36 pm to da prophet
quote:
SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Whether or not immunity exists isn’t the question. The limits of that immunity is what the Court has to parse out.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:41 pm to da prophet
quote:
If they would that would mean impeachment, which is the current process for charging presidents would be voided.
No it wouldn’t. Impeachment and legal proceedings have zero connection in any way. Neither has any relation whatsoever to the other.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:23 pm to da prophet
Some of you baws haven't read, nor do you understand, the Constitution.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:27 pm to da prophet
quote:
If they would that would mean impeachment, which is the current process for charging presidents would be voided.
Good thing for Sleepy Joe that he wasn't legally elected, amirite?
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:43 pm to da prophet
quote:
Biden could be indicted by a red state DA right now and be forced to stand trial while in office .
This has to be in the bag of tricks. Democrats have opened that can of worms and they will never give it up. Even big blue city DAs can take a swipe at a R president in the future. Think Austin, Texas and well as Atlanta Georgia, Phoenix, Arizona.
This now will never end. It's last man/group standing.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 5:40 pm to da prophet
I’m afraid if they give blanket immunity to Trump then Biden starts the wet work.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:00 pm to da prophet
Impeachment is not a substitute for criminal prosecution. They are two
separate things for separate purposes.
SCOTUS will issue a ruling that ensures there will be no trial before the election. They delayed the case in
The manner they took it up. I once admired the Court. Now, they really are just politicians in robes. Alito is an. Embarrassment. Gorsuch is a fraud.
separate things for separate purposes.
SCOTUS will issue a ruling that ensures there will be no trial before the election. They delayed the case in
The manner they took it up. I once admired the Court. Now, they really are just politicians in robes. Alito is an. Embarrassment. Gorsuch is a fraud.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News