Started By
Message

re: Milazzo should have been playing all along

Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
2961 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

This team can’t afford to have such a weak defensive catcher that isn’t making up for it with his bat in the slightest bit


And if this was still March when Neal wasn’t contributing at all in SEC play, you would have a stronger point. He struggled, so they started giving Milazzo more ABs. The result? Milazzo started struggling at the plate in April while Neal started hitting better. Milazzo was the key to the victory last night, but it was his first good SEC game in awhile. Yet somehow, everyone wants to judge both players on March instead of April. They need to play both until one or the other starts producing consistently or failing to produce consistently.
Posted by Rudy40
Baton Rouge,La
Member since Jan 2007
2993 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:33 pm to
Mike the Tiger71 you say Neal has begun to hit better? So I guess going from hitting .097 in SEC play to .114 in SEC play is better but how low do u want to set the bar for a guy who is also well below average defensively? I mean if he improved his average 100 points to .214 in SEC play he still would be way below average.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram