Started By
Message

re: Ethernet switches that do not have loop detection

Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:52 am to
Posted by Miketheseventh
Member since Dec 2017
5811 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:52 am to
I changed the title. It is called loop detection not loop end. I was just curious if this is a make or break deal for the ones that do not have it
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:20 pm to
In a home or small office setting it's hardly a concern. STP or any sort of loop detection is only needed if there is a chance of accidentally (or purposely) creating a loop. It's more of an enterprise feature to solve an enterprise problem,
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18073 posts
Posted on 4/30/24 at 2:32 pm to
quote:


I changed the title. It is called loop detection not loop end. I was just curious if this is a make or break deal for the ones that do not have it


The only potential issue in home use is with multiple wireless access points/mesh systems. Some of those systems can be communicating briefly over both a wireless and a wired backhaul. This can appear as a loop in a network. If there is loop detection protection in a network switch, it can prevent the wireless network from operating properly.

For home use the safe choice is not to have loop detection but if you do have it, make sure it is possible to disable it should you need to.
This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 2:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram