Started By
Message

NAACP weighs in on St. George.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:08 pm
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
24274 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:08 pm
Searched, didn’t see. Sorry if already posted.

quote:

As representatives of the Baton Rouge Chapter of the NAACP, we are deeply committed to safeguarding the well-being, education, and economic security of Black people and all persons of color in our city. It is with this commitment in mind that we address you today regarding the recent Louisiana Supreme Court decision supporting the incorporation of the proposed city of St. George and the Louisiana Legislature’s proposal of House Bill 6.

The St. George plan poses significant risks to our education system, threatens the continuity of critical programs, and challenges community representation. The creation of a new municipality introduces considerable uncertainty around funding allocation for our schools, jeopardizing the cornerstone of our community's future: education. We urge the court to ensure that current funding levels are maintained, if not increased, to support our schools during this transition period. We emphasize the importance of community involvement in decisions that impact our children's education. The incorporation of St. George should not diminish transparency or reduce community input.

We acknowledge Mayor-President Broome's opposition to the movement, reflecting concerns about potential segregation and unequal resource distribution. In light of these considerations, we call upon organizers, policymakers, and supporters to recognize the broader implications for education, community representation, and social justice. Our children and community deserve a stable, equitable, and inclusive environment, and we implore decision makers to prioritize these fundamental values.

Additionally, we express our concerns about the proposed annexation into the new city of St. George and its implications for education. While we understand the desire for local autonomy, we urge careful consideration of the potential disruptions and increased financial burden on our schools and students. Drawing from the experiences of other Louisiana communities, we stress the importance of a comprehensive plan, community input, and collaboration to mitigate these challenges and safeguard the quality of education for our students.

House Bill 6, by Representative Emily Chenevert, creates additional issues. Key concerns include the displacement of nearly 7,000 children and the unclear fate of those in specialized programs such as magnet, gifted and talented, focus choice, and C Tech. The impact on children with disabilities remains uncertain, as it could affect specialized classrooms and related services. The unknown costs of this legislation could negatively affect surrounding school districts like Baker, Central, and Zachary, as well as EBRPSS's ability to provide contracted services to children with disabilities. Further complicating matters are the potential expenses associated with acquiring or leasing buildings, buses, and other infrastructure, as well as the negative impact on staff employment and benefits. Critics also highlight the lack of a comprehensive plan addressing sustainability, funding, services, programs, staff benefits, and, most critically, the needs of students and families.

In conclusion, we stand ready to collaborate with you to ensure that the interests of our students are protected and that they continue to have access to the excellent education they deserve, regardless of any changes in municipal boundaries. Thank you for your time and consideration of these crucial matters


I’m not normally at a loss for words, but the racist bullshite in this is truly fricking mind blowing. Plea into the wind to keep the white people and their money hostage.

LINK
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124572 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:10 pm to
The Organization of Colored People?
Posted by LSUMaverick
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2016
1722 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:11 pm to
Color me shocked.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48799 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:13 pm to
Damn near every public school in the city has a F rating. Woodlawn might be a D. What exactly are they getting in return with the current level of funding?
Posted by Evil Little Thing
Member since Jul 2013
11257 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:15 pm to
Relatedly, the number of people on the Baton Rouge subreddit who don’t understand the difference between a city & a parish is laughable. Squawking literal nonsense about St. George and how St. George is freeloading off of Baton Rouge.

And these folks have a vote.
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
1523 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:15 pm to
The NAACP can eat a dick. What have they done in the past 40 years to advance anything? All they do is blame white folks for bullshite that happens in their neighborhoods.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22487 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:16 pm to
These colored people be wildin
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
37372 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:16 pm to
You could increase funding for every Baton Rouge school 10x and they’d still be dogshit. Funding schools doesn’t fix home issues.
Posted by Skillet
Member since Aug 2006
107957 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:18 pm to
So, they want more free taxpayer money to continue misusing it? Maybe they should request more fathers to raise the kids.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26720 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:21 pm to
Nephew lives in St George... He sends his kids to private school so he doesn't have to deal with this BS...
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 8:29 pm
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25082 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:21 pm to
This is a more distilled form of representation and govt for people of color in BR without those pesky ypipo getting in the way. You’d think they’d love this.

Oooooo, that’s right. They don’t want ypipo having a say in the general governance and education system, but they sure do want ypipo’s taxes to fund their shite disproportionately to what their own communities pay into the system.

This is exactly why this STG stuff got started, and for good reason.
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
1537 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:24 pm to
This could not have been more racist had the KKK come out with a similar statement.

I do not live in East Baton Rouge Parish and wondered if vote to separate St. George was political, economic, or something else. The NAACP's weigh in on it tells me why.
Posted by terriblegreen
Souf Badden Rewage
Member since Aug 2011
9674 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:39 pm to
Jesus. Not that this is the least bit surprising, but come on. Stand on your own two feet at some point. Quit blaming every fricking thing on the man.
Posted by Bazzatcha
Member since May 2017
749 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:39 pm to
I agree with this man, current funding levels should be maintained unfortunately I think this guy is expecting other people to pay for it. If only we could all have free shite...
Posted by 4x4tiger
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
2967 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:39 pm to


Didn't them people just lose a $17 million dollar charter school???
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 3:51 pm
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142485 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

we are deeply committed to safeguarding the well-being, education, and economic security of Black people and all persons of color
but not wypipo
Posted by LSUMaverick
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2016
1722 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

we are deeply committed to safeguarding the well-being, education, and economic security of Black people


The Black people
:
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
5399 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:46 pm to
I haven't read all of the paperwork, but how exactly does St. George prevent people of color from moving there? Is it in the rules, or like a moat or wall?
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 9:54 pm
Posted by DrrTiger
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2023
374 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:51 pm to
I wonder if in the entire history of the democrat party there has ever been a problem that they didn’t think more taxpayer money could solve.

I’m guessing not.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14035 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

As representatives of the Baton Rouge Chapter of the NAACP, we are deeply committed to safeguarding the well-being, education, and economic security of Black people and all persons of color in our city. It is with this commitment in mind that we address you today regarding the recent Louisiana Supreme Court decision supporting the incorporation of the proposed city of St. George and the Louisiana Legislature’s proposal of House Bill 6. The St. George plan poses significant risks to our education system, threatens the continuity of critical programs, and challenges community representation. The creation of a new municipality introduces considerable uncertainty around funding allocation for our schools, jeopardizing the cornerstone of our community's future: education. We urge the court to ensure that current funding levels are maintained, if not increased, to support our schools during this transition period. We emphasize the importance of community involvement in decisions that impact our children's education. The incorporation of St. George should not diminish transparency or reduce community input. We acknowledge Mayor-President Broome's opposition to the movement, reflecting concerns about potential segregation and unequal resource distribution. In light of these considerations, we call upon organizers, policymakers, and supporters to recognize the broader implications for education, community representation, and social justice. Our children and community deserve a stable, equitable, and inclusive environment, and we implore decision makers to prioritize these fundamental values. Additionally, we express our concerns about the proposed annexation into the new city of St. George and its implications for education. While we understand the desire for local autonomy, we urge careful consideration of the potential disruptions and increased financial burden on our schools and students. Drawing from the experiences of other Louisiana communities, we stress the importance of a comprehensive plan, community input, and collaboration to mitigate these challenges and safeguard the quality of education for our students. House Bill 6, by Representative Emily Chenevert, creates additional issues. Key concerns include the displacement of nearly 7,000 children and the unclear fate of those in specialized programs such as magnet, gifted and talented, focus choice, and C Tech. The impact on children with disabilities remains uncertain, as it could affect specialized classrooms and related services. The unknown costs of this legislation could negatively affect surrounding school districts like Baker, Central, and Zachary, as well as EBRPSS's ability to provide contracted services to children with disabilities. Further complicating matters are the potential expenses associated with acquiring or leasing buildings, buses, and other infrastructure, as well as the negative impact on staff employment and benefits. Critics also highlight the lack of a comprehensive plan addressing sustainability, funding, services, programs, staff benefits, and, most critically, the needs of students and families. In conclusion, we stand ready to collaborate with you to ensure that the interests of our students are protected and that they continue to have access to the excellent education they deserve, regardless of any changes in municipal boundaries. Thank you for your time and consideration of these crucial matters
TLDR; It ain’t our fault.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram