Started By
Message

re: A Doctor at Cigna Said Her Bosses Pressured Her to Review Patients’ Cases Too Quickly.

Posted on 5/6/24 at 7:37 am to
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30284 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 7:37 am to
quote:

People in this country already don't have enough vested stake in their healthcare or conditions but continually point the finger at other people and expect someone else to pay for things that don't actually improve their condition.


This isn’t a loaded question because I’m one of those that are pretty ignorant about it. I agree with the posters here that say if it’s meets the criteria of a partnered doc, it should be covered.

What’s your solution?
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53961 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 7:43 am to
quote:

I agree with the posters here that say if it’s meets the criteria of a partnered doc, it should be covered.



I do agree that fi something meets criteria it should be covered but thats not really what the article is describing. It's describing something that doesnt meet criteria.

If there is something that a medical director reviews because it already doesn't meet standard criteria (meaning the nurse who initially reviewed it flagged it for denial) that decision falls to them. Another medical director reviewing the same case could have a different opinion and approve it so for those cases that are denied, the patients do have appeal rights to have the request reviewed by third party review sources which are clinicians for another opinion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram