- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Merchan threatens Trump with jail time for next gag order violation
Posted on 5/6/24 at 1:32 pm to KiwiHead
Posted on 5/6/24 at 1:32 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
What's hilarious here, is that so many of his supporters WANT him thrown in jail
Because so far, these trials have done little but turn more Americans against the Democrats.
The media and Dems made him stronger during the GOP Primary by continuing this act. Maybe that was intentional because they “wanted” him as the nominee, but now, I think it’s backfiring. The more these trials go on without some sort of real smoking gun dead proof that he did something criminal, the more “independent” voters become disgusted by the prosecution.
1
Posted on 5/6/24 at 1:40 pm to beachdude
Solitary. No secret service needed. Like Alonzo says:
Twenty three hour lock down!
Shoe program trumpa!
Twenty three hour lock down!
Shoe program trumpa!
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:04 pm to ragincajun03
Or...if it becomes too much of a circus, the public starts to get turned off by both. Because I suspect there is the possibility of a hung jury....which Bragg no doubt will oblige his benefactors by continuing, of which Trump could only pray for from a PR standpoint.
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:21 pm to RuLSU
quote:
My god, you can't even criticize a jury and court officials in a criminal trial anymore? It's outrageous.
Why or when on earth can a criminal defendant not criticize a court or a jury outside of actual court proceedings? If that is the rule for court defendants generally, it's blatantly unconstitutional. But I doubt that it is the rule.
Any criminal defendant should be able to say whatever they want about the court, trial, and jury, unless court is actually in session.
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:26 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Please try this so the Secret Service can step in and explain what you and the TDS tards don't understand.
Posted on 5/6/24 at 3:39 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Do it!
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News