Started By
Message

re: Six Reasons Why Tulsi Gabbard Is Donald Trump's Best Choice As A Running Mate

Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109046 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Patently false. Unless you’re saying Congress can’t create executive departments.


Its job overtly is to go around your constitutional rights to illegally spy on you. DHS is just one of many departments where we should just say “Afuera!” to them.


quote:

NSA is DOD. CIA is independent under DNI, and FBI is DOJ.


Honestly all of these agencies should be destroyed and put under one banner, and dozens if not hundreds of them should be in fricking jail.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26624 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Just say you don't give a frick, because you don't.

I won’t. Because I do. It’s just not a factor in this election.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72631 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Because I do.


You're full of shite.

quote:

It’s just not a factor in this election.


It's a factor every election.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26624 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Its job overtly is to go around your constitutional rights to illegally spy on you.

What part of DHS does this?

FEMA? Border Control?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109046 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

What part of DHS does this?


Ask Tucker Carlson.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26624 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

You're full of shite.

How so?
quote:

It's a factor every election.

How so? Neither major candidate has a relevant position on guns this cycle. The next congress wont do anything at all on it, regardless of its composition. The math isn’t there
This post was edited on 5/6/24 at 2:28 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26624 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:28 pm to
I’m asking you. You made the statement.
Posted by TigerBaitOohHaHa
Member since Jan 2023
512 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:28 pm to
I agree this would be an interesting move.

Something lost to many dyed in the wool Republicans who want to add a VP that is as far right as possible is that this move won't bring any new voters. Anyone who appeals to the most conservative voters was already gonna go Trump (with few exceptions). I've listened to her on many extended format interviews and she seems like an articulate, intelligent woman with heterodox views. I'm not sure Trump is going to get DeSantis on the under-ticket, I'd personally like that matchup, but it isn't adding women voters. It isn't adding centrists. It isn't adding Florida voters, because Florida is already Red. ..
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109046 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

I’m asking you. You made the statement.


I believe it was the DHS that was spying on him and his texts with the Russian government and then went around and threatened Tucker.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11468 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

We don't need one that was a Socialist Democrat in Congress as recently as 2020.
A person has to ask, exactly what she believes in order to be Socialist Democrat. That's akin to putting Robery Byrd at the helm of the NAACP.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49769 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

She raped Kamala Harris on stage for all the world to see


While running for president as a DEMOCRAT.

FOUR years ago.


Sweet baby Jesus.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72631 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

How so?


You're throwing support around for people with long histories of attacking the Second Amendment.

quote:

How so?


Action trumps rhetoric.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26624 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

I believe it was the DHS that was spying on him and his texts with the Russian government and then went around and threatened Tucker.

Which agency of DHS? Where’s that coming from?

Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26624 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

You're throwing support around for people with long histories of attacking the Second Amendment.

Have I shown support for anyone in this thread?


I’ll be voting for Donald Trump in November. He’s got a history of infringing on the second amendment. But guess what? On the whole I prefer him to Joe Biden. Do you support some obscure candidate with no chance of winning that you’d prefer I waste my vote on?
This post was edited on 5/6/24 at 2:32 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72631 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Neither major candidate has a relevant position on guns this cycle. The next congress wont do anything at all on it, regardless of its composition.


Also...

So fricking what...

I told you that you didn't give a frick, and I always appreciate when someone proves me right on their own.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109046 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Which agency of DHS? Where’s that coming from?


Not sure, but I’ll dig into it over the course of the day.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37910 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:31 pm to
I’d consider voting Trump if he chose Tulsi as VP

As it stands now I’m gonna vote for RFK.

Trump just has nothing to say that is good messaging these days, is old as frick (the real issue that bothers me), refuses to admit he was wrong on Covid, etc.

And I voted for Trump twice, and previously voted for McCain ( ) when I was 18. Was too drunk in college to vote in 2012.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72631 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Have I shown support for anyone in this thread?


You've only ever posted in this thread?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116309 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

While running for president as a DEMOCRAT.

FOUR years ago.


Sweet baby Jesus.


The barometer for many Republican voters now is just liking what someone has to say at any given moment.

Past or voting record has become totally irrelevant.

Its no wonder the Clay Travis's and Tim Pool's have taken over the discourse
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26624 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Also... So fricking what... I told you that you didn't give a frick, and I always appreciate when someone proves me right on their own.

POTUS elections are a binary choice. What is your point even supposed to be?
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram