- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:39 pm to hall59tiger
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:39 pm to hall59tiger
quote:He was no where near interfering with the throw through
This is proves it was interference and where your argument crumbles to pieces. The runner was well inside the baseline at the time of the throw, clearly interfering. That’s exactly what happened lol
The throw went right of the damn bag and the runner was nowhere near it
Purple dot is Milazzo, red dot is gump. Please tell me there was interference to the throw. He has a wide arse open throwing lane
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:48 pm
2
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:48 pm to lsupride87
I can’t believe this is still going. I wish there was a view from the third base line to show the angle of the throw. I don’t think people realize how far out from the plate he was.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:49 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The throw went right of the damn bag and the runner was nowhere near it
In the words of Hans Landa….”it’s a bingo”.
The throw was off because the runner was inside the baseline, therefore interfering with the throw. It doesn’t have to be a perfect throw to interfere.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News