Started By
Message

re: The BCS MANIPULATION

Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:16 am to
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:16 am to
quote:

.009 or something like that.


YOU have an opinion. The formula was, indeed, exceedingly close.


ETA: You may think that OSU was the correct choice.

I believe that BAMA was the correct choice. Obviously, it was "close"



You only look at the surface of the results. Look at the formula.....oh wait you cant...they are not published and no one can figure it out.


Ok, lets look at the Harris and Coaches....yeah some of those votes make no sense. The manipulation was obvious.
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 11:18 am
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:20 am to
quote:

You only look at the surface of the results. Look at the formula.....oh wait you cant...they are not published and no one can figure it out.





It was the same way every time LSU made it to the big game. Different formulas, but same situation. "We" are only whining now because of the Bama factor.


quote:

Ok, lets look at the Harris and Coaches....yeah some of those votes make no sense. The manipulation was obvious.



The "manipulation" is inferred by the viewer. The sample size is large enough that the level of "manipulation" would need to be very high to make a huge affect.


Again, I think the formula got it right.

Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
33086 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Ok, lets look at the Harris and Coaches....yeah some of those votes make no sense. The manipulation was obvious.


Which ones?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram