Started By
Message

re: I swear there are some dumb people on the face book and the TD.COM

Posted on 1/16/17 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5097 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

What if guy buys $70 worth of lottery tickets (no cost to store owner)


Were any of them winners? The store makes commission off of the sale plus a percentage of the winnings.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67593 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 4:02 pm to
guy won 170 million jackpot and then overcome with guilt returned the stolen $100...now the store owner is suing for the 170 mil jackpot
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
7480 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 7:20 am to
quote:

He lost $100. You are trying to find out how much she stole in your narrative, which is not what the question asked. The owner lost the initial $100. The thief got $30 plus the groceries, but that's not what is being asked.



I have done this in my head 100 times and I keep coming up with $200 as the answer
Posted by NorfolkTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
351 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 7:46 am to
I say the owner has a net loss of $200.
Let's say the register had $200 to start.

If there was no theft and the owner sold $70 worth of inventory he would have a total of $270

With the robbery (200-100-70+70-30)= $70
-100 for initial theft
-70 for loss of groceries
+70 for the transaction
-30 change from stolen money

$270-70=$200
Posted by DivotBreath
On the course
Member since Oct 2007
3514 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 7:51 am to
Professor Plum ... in the Library ... with the candlestick.

Posted by crtodd
Member since Nov 2005
1723 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:03 am to
But is the unladen swallow of the European or African variety?
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
35502 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:05 am to
$100 plus his faith in humanity.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166500 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:06 am to
best part of the question: DON'T OVERTHINK IT.... so just get a wrong answer that's not technically correct all the way.
Posted by PaperPaintball92
Fly Navy
Member since Aug 2010
5297 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:51 am to
$100
Posted by Fusaichi Pegasus
Meh He Co
Member since Oct 2010
14572 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:55 am to
Are goods fifo or lifo?
Deprecating assets?
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7781 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

I say the owner has a net loss of $200.
Let's say the register had $200 to start.

If there was no theft and the owner sold $70 worth of inventory he would have a total of $270

With the robbery (200-100-70+70-30)= $70
-100 for initial theft
-70 for loss of groceries
+70 for the transaction
-30 change from stolen money

$270-70=$200


To make it easier on you, assume that the thief and customer are two separate people. Register has $200, thief steals $100. Now a customer buys $70 in groceries, the register only has $170, but should have $270.
$270 - $170 = $100.

You are thinking way too much simply because you know the money being used was stolen. The fact that the money was stolen has no bearing on the register and actual cash lost in the scenario.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:07 am to
quote:

-70 for loss of groceries
+70 for the transaction
-30 change from stolen money


This made sense in your head?

The transaction was $70 in groceries and $30 in change for $100, not $70.

Not to mention you are trying to track the register balance and are subtracting the $70 of groceries from your total. The actual groceries are not money buddy.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 11:12 am
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Are goods fifo or lifo?
Deprecating assets?


Weighted average cost and we Sec. 179 the assets.
Posted by Chuckd
Louisiana
Member since May 2013
797 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:22 am to
It's simple. What did she leave the store with? She left with $30 in cash and $70 worth of groceries. That's all she left with. She gave the $100 bill back. So the owner lost $30 plus $70 worth of groceries.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7781 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:28 am to
quote:

$70 worth of groceries.




The fact that she bought groceries with the bill has zero bearing on the situation, it is intended to confuse you. What if she bought the groceries then stole the money? What if she used a different $100 bill to buy the groceries? What if the two events occurred a year apart?
Posted by munchman
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
10323 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:45 am to
$200
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 11:47 am
Posted by xGeauxLSUx
United States of Atrophy
Member since Oct 2008
21025 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:47 am to
quote:

A women walks into a grocery store and steals $100 dollars out of the register without the owners knowledge.



Wait, so there is a group of women that stole the cash and multiple owners?


Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
24604 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:48 am to
quote:

The doctor is the mother.


FIFY
Posted by Brummy
Central, LA
Member since Oct 2009
4513 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

milk

quote:

often sold at or below cost

Not in Louisiana
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47537 posts
Posted on 1/17/17 at 12:03 pm to
If you get <$100, you over thunk it.
If you got >$100, you're stupid.


End of story.

This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 12:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram