Started By
Message

re: Is insurance that covers pre existing conditions really insurance ?

Posted on 10/19/18 at 4:52 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140729 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 4:52 pm to
Nothing you said changes my answer.

The answer is no for individual policies.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20923 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Nothing you said changes my answer.

The answer is no for individual policies.


So lets say you, roadgator, have insurance and go to the doctor tomorrow and find out you have leukemia. Lets say for the sake of argument that your wife carries insurance for the two of you.

Shortly after diagnosis she switches jobs with no lapse in coverage.

Why should the new insurance pickup your ongoing cancer treatments for your pre-existing condition?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99153 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:15 pm to
No
Posted by Johnpettigrew
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2017
1633 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:28 pm to
You do realize most chronic diseases that inflict the biggest burden on the healthcare system are self inflicted by diet, drinking, and smoking? All personal choices.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111609 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

Why should the new insurance pickup your ongoing cancer treatments for your pre-existing condition?


From my perspective, this is a question for benefits departments. If you want talented people to work for you, you have to take these sorts of questions into account when developing a benefits package. If a company decided to not conver the preexisting conditions of new employees who had no lapse in coverage, it could limit their pool of available employees.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140729 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Why should the new insurance pickup your ongoing cancer treatments for your pre-existing condition?


Because that is how group insurance works?
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:53 pm to
Of course not
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 5:56 pm to
frick no
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20923 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

You do realize most chronic diseases that inflict the biggest burden on the healthcare system are self inflicted by diet, drinking, and smoking?


I am sure you'll be the first to explain this to lung cancer survivors who dont and have never smoked or those with liver conditions that dont drink to excess.

Did you know that cancer is also determined by environment and genetics?
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

I am sure you'll be the first to explain this to lung cancer survivors who dont and have never smoked or those with liver conditions that dont drink to excess. Did you know that cancer is also determined by environment and genetics?


If you work for a while in a cancer treatment center it becomes apparent that among those with oral, throat, and lung cancer those people are outliers.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 8:11 pm to
We need to change the pricing model of healthcare to a subscription based model.

Medicare changed the overall pricing model in the eighties. My first health insurance policy paid $100 per day to the hospital and that was it. It paid the doctor's bills but none of these 40 page bills we see today. Somebody had the idea to got to a fee for service pricing model based on individual services and the health care industry started inventing things they could bill for. Medicare is about 50% of our healthcare and providers cannot charge anyone else LESS than they charge medicare so it becomes a floor for medical pricing that is ever increasing as providers lobby bureaucrats and Congress.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 8:12 pm to
Sure. You just have to design it properly.

There are two mandates for a properly designed pre-existing conditions clause:

(1) Deter rent seeking. You don't want people who are healthy to deliberately forgo buying insurance to save the premiums only to buy it after they get sick.

(2) Protect people who have coverage and for whatever reason lose coverage (job loss, job change, etc) who are already sick from being kicked to the curb.

It's quite a simple thing to do, really.
Posted by KingOrange
Mayfair
Member since Aug 2018
8686 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Pre existing


No you can not burn your house down then buy fire insurance. Damn!
Posted by Soonergirl
Edmond, OK
Member since Oct 2018
7 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 9:50 pm to
Many chronic conditions are auto-immune. I'm 45, and two years ago my immune system was triggered. There are so many of these illnesses. I'm thin, never smoked, and I exercised. Now, I take a medicine that would cost $5,000 per month if not insured. Without it, my spine would fuse and I would still be in horrible pain. Believe me, you know plenty of people with similar chronic conditions. Many illnesses are NOT preventable.
Posted by Johnpettigrew
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2017
1633 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 9:59 pm to
I said most. My father in law died from environmentally caused cancer. My wife has also been a physician in the “charity” system for over 30 years and she will also agree with the self infliction. She is so out done with people who can’t make an effort to take their free meds to help keep their chronic illnesses under control or maybe not eat some sugar loaded dessert to help control their diabetes, she is about to leave the patient care business. Patients can make enough excuses for themselves without you doing it for them.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64208 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 10:10 pm to
Insurance should be insurance, planning for unforseen circumstances. I have an idea-

1. HSA's must be provided by all employers. Employers don't have to contribute, but employees must. A minimum 5% of gross income (or more if elected) goes into it until it reaches $10,000 then employee can opt down to 1%. Employers can be allowed to contribute also, but aren't required to.

2. High deductible catastrophic insurance should be mandatory. Yes, forced insurance.


3. With 1 and 2 in force, there should be no problem with pre-existing conditions.
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3641 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Medicare is about 50% of our healthcare and providers cannot charge anyone else LESS than they charge medicare


This is not true

Stick to tariffs
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

Is insurance that covers pre existing conditions really insurance ?


Nope, it's not. Insurance is to cover you IN CASE something happens.

Demanding someone pay for something that has already happened isn't insurance.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29678 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 11:51 pm to
No.

Let's say I don't have collision insurance on my truck because it's paid off. I get drunk at the deer camp and go mud riding and t-bone a tree and trash my bumper, grill and hood. Can I go on Monday after I sober up and go put collision on it and expect the insurance company to pay to fix it?

No.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57383 posts
Posted on 10/19/18 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

Is insurance that covers pre existing conditions really insurance ?
Nope.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram