- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This trade got vetoed. Please give me your thoughts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:13 pm
Team A -
DeAndre Hopkins
Ryan Mathews
for
Team B -
Jonathan Stewart
Eli Manning
DeAndre Hopkins
Ryan Mathews
for
Team B -
Jonathan Stewart
Eli Manning
8
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:14 pm to PokerChamp21
That's bull... Why?
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:15 pm to PokerChamp21
I mean its certainly not a good trade, but don't know the circumstances behind it
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:15 pm to Noplacelikehome
quote:
Thats bull... Why?
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:15 pm to PokerChamp21
Pretty fair trade, don't see why it got vetoed.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:19 pm to PokerChamp21
Especially in a standard league. I'm guessing people thought team B was getting too muc??
Stewart could turn out to be the best player in this trade.
Stewart could turn out to be the best player in this trade.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:20 pm to Noplacelikehome
They said the team receiving the Hopkins/Mathews side was "trade raping the other guy"
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:22 pm to PokerChamp21
quote:
They said the team receiving the Hopkins/Mathews side was "trade raping the other guy"
Clearly not collusion and shouldn't be vetoed. I would not play in that league if that is how vetoes go.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:26 pm to Noplacelikehome
quote:
Stewart could turn out to be the best player in this trade.
I agree 100%. I actually think that the collusion going on here is between the people vetoing this trade.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:31 pm to ATLsuTiger
Seems like it would be a fair, need-based trade. Don't know exactly why it would be vetoed.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:33 pm to PokerChamp21
that's why trades shouldn't lie in the votes of other kelly owners
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:42 pm to PokerChamp21
Mate I would quit that league.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 6:39 pm to PokerChamp21
bullshite to veto, absurd
Posted on 9/3/15 at 6:42 pm to PokerChamp21
bullshite. Throw a hissy fit. Demand your money back. It's what I would do.
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 6:43 pm to PokerChamp21
I would demand a reason.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 6:44 pm to LSUnivFan
Doesn't matter if it's fair, if both owners are willing it goes through. Period.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 6:45 pm to PokerChamp21
quote:
They said the team receiving the Hopkins/Mathews side was "trade raping the other guy"
Who cares, if both owners are willing it goes through. End of discussion.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News