- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Anyone ever used beef broth instead of chicken stock in their red beans?
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:29 pm
(no message)
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:31 pm to sloopy
Never tried that but the last time I made red beans I used some Penzey's ham base and it was damn good.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:37 pm to sloopy
Always, also a couple tablespoons of LARD FTW!!!
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:43 pm to 91TIGER
I have never tried it, never planned on it, but I sent the fiance to the store and she forgot chicken stock. So it won't mess up the flavor if I use beef stock?
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:45 pm to sloopy
I use a ham stock and I also usually have a meaty ham bone or hocks in mine.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:47 pm to Gris Gris
I use them too. I guess my question is can I sub beef stock for chicken stock and not ruin my beans?
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:53 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
I wouldn't use beef stock.
Why?
I doubt 99% of the people on the planet would be able to tell the difference. Why not use beef in a dish that includes sausage and ham?
Posted on 9/22/13 at 5:56 pm to TigerMyth36
Because its not a beef based dish. If you have ham in it or ham bones, you can just use water. I don't see the purpose of using beef stock. I prefer the flavor if the ham/pork with red beans
This post was edited on 9/22/13 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:00 pm to Gris Gris
I agree with you, but the OP never mentioned using a ham stock. He was going to use chicken stock but now only has beef stock.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:03 pm to SW2SCLA
I'd just use water, then.
OP, are you adding ham, pork, sausage or just cooking plain beans with no meat? I'd still just use water. The beans make a stock themselves.
I don't think you'll ruin them, but I don't see the need for beef stock.
OP, are you adding ham, pork, sausage or just cooking plain beans with no meat? I'd still just use water. The beans make a stock themselves.
I don't think you'll ruin them, but I don't see the need for beef stock.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:05 pm to sloopy
Never thought of using chicken stock in red or white beans.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:07 pm to Gris Gris
Made a hug pot of ham stock yesterday, reduced the hell of it, and the picking off the bones awaits, white beans Tuesday.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:09 pm to sloopy
Just use water. The sausage, beans and seasonings will provide plenty of flavor. If you want to make sort of a stock, boil water in a pot, put the whole sausage in and let it sit, top on the pot, for about 15 minutes or so. Use that water for the beans and then do whatever you usually do with the sausage.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:34 pm to sloopy
Either is fine. I've done both and I never just use water.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:54 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
Just use water. The sausage, beans and seasonings will provide plenty of flavor.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:14 pm to sloopy
Use beef stock it will be fine.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:27 pm to sloopy
I just use water with smoked ham hocks. I add andouille in the last 45 minutes or so. I prefer the pork flavor .
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:36 pm to sloopy
I'd say go ahead. But then I use beef sausage when I make red beans. So don't listen to me.
Popular
Back to top
