Started By
Message

What’s the best briquette charcoal for smoking a pork butt?

Posted on 7/23/18 at 12:06 pm
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27663 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 12:06 pm
I am smoking a pork butt in my Weber kettle this weekend using the snake method. I’m going to add hickory chunks.

What’s the best briquette charcoal for this method? Royal Oak? Kingsford? Stubb’s? Cowboy? Weber? Something else?

TIA
Posted by Hat Tricks
Member since Oct 2003
28772 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 12:20 pm to
I really like the Weber briquettes. I would go with those if you can get them. If not, Kingsford blue bag.
Posted by jmon
Loisiana
Member since Oct 2010
9232 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 12:41 pm to
Kingsford Blue FTW.

ETA: Add some fruit wood in the mix.
This post was edited on 7/23/18 at 12:43 pm
Posted by timbo
Red Stick, La.
Member since Dec 2011
7701 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 12:50 pm to
I used to be a real snob about using lump charcoal, then I read this.

LINK

Basically, it says briquettes work best. And it quotes competition BBQ guys like Harry Soo who say things such as "I use whatever briquettes are on sale" or "I use whatever briquettes the sponsor is giving away"
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57940 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

What’s the best briquette charcoal
move to lump and never go back.
Posted by Hat Tricks
Member since Oct 2003
28772 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

move to lump and never go back.


Lump doesn't work too great for the snake method.
Posted by heatom2
At the plant, baw.
Member since Nov 2010
12990 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 1:58 pm to
kingsford blue is the best. It burns evenly and consistently.
This post was edited on 7/23/18 at 2:00 pm
Posted by jaydoubleyew
Downtown
Member since Oct 2011
726 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:14 pm to
I like kingsford for the snake method in my Weber kettle. I’m just not good at knowing how lump will heat. Kingsford is very consistent and predictable.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27663 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:24 pm to
Thanks for all the responses. I’ve used Kingsford for some time with some success too. I figured I’d try Royal Oak, since it gets good reviews online and apparently has less chemical additives.
Posted by rutiger
purgatory
Member since Jun 2007
21590 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:52 pm to
I use kingsford for the consistency, i found lump to be too “unpredictable.”
Posted by Brisketeer
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
1551 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 8:28 pm to
Kingsford makes a competition briquettte with less additives. It worked well for me in a WSM.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44031 posts
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:37 am to
quote:

move to lump and never go back.


Lump is for grilling. Briquettes for smoking. Briquettes are more consistent, which you want for smoking.

Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
59216 posts
Posted on 7/24/18 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Lump is for grilling. Briquettes for smoking.
so much wrong in this statement.


Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44031 posts
Posted on 7/24/18 at 10:06 am to
quote:

so much wrong in this statement.


Feel free to enlighten me.
Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
59216 posts
Posted on 7/24/18 at 10:13 am to
Lump is way cleaner and better all around... for grilling and smoking. Briquettes are filled with other garbage such as sawdust, starch, paper, and God knows what else to bind them together. In addition to all that, when using briquettes, you’re left with a smoker filled with ash to clog up your vents. I’ve tried briquettes in my smoker one time because I was drunk and out of lump... it’s a messy disaster compared to lump.
This post was edited on 7/24/18 at 10:15 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44031 posts
Posted on 7/24/18 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Lump is way cleaner and better all around... for grilling and smoking.


For grilling, not for smoking. Lump is inconsistent temperature wise...and you want consistent temps when smoking.

quote:

Briquettes are filled with other garbage such as sawdust, starch, paper, and God knows what else to bind them together.


Stop using shitty low quality briquettes and you won't have this issue.

quote:

In addition to all that, when using briquettes, you’re left with a smoker filled with ash to clog up your vents.


See above.

On top of all this, using the snake or minion method with lump doesn't work. When I'm on a long smoke with a brisket or butt, the last thing I want to do is mess with lighting more charcoal every couple hours.

Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
59216 posts
Posted on 7/24/18 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Lump is inconsistent temperature wise.
Not the case on my BGE.

quote:

On top of all this, using the snake or minion method with lump doesn't work. When I'm on a long smoke with a brisket or butt, the last thing I want to do is mess with lighting more charcoal every couple hours.


Do what works for you.
This post was edited on 7/24/18 at 10:35 am
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
8759 posts
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Lump is for grilling. Briquettes for smoking. Briquettes are more consistent, which you want for smoking.


This has become my credo over the years, as well. Lump is great for high temperature grilling where you really want that clean charred flavor to get into the crust created by the heat. Lump burns much quicker than briquettes and is a pain in most smokers. This guy arguing with you is using a GBE so, really, his experience may be accurate with a komodo style cooker but, when using my WSM, lump burns far too quickly.

I love Royal Oak but the only place I can snag it is Lowe's, which isn't that close to my grocery shopping spots. I usually opt for Kingsford.
Posted by sml71
Run if you hear banjos.
Member since Dec 2005
4338 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 6:14 am to
I basically draw the line on briquettes v lump based on cook time. This is because, over time, I noticed that briquettes give off their own smoke that, although not unpleasant to smell, does impact flavor. The next time that you light a chimney of briquettes, notice all of the smoke that comes out once your tinder is gone. Notice again when you’ve got it all lit and you transfer your charcoal to your smoker (but before you add your wood).

Lump isn’t nearly as smoky and, to the extent that it is smoky, it tends to be wood smoke instead of binder smoke (glue smoke).

But the downside is that lump doesn’t burn for nearly as long as briquettes will, so if I need a long low and slow, such as for a pork shoulder or for a brisket, I go with briquettes (being sure to let the glue smoke die down before putting the meat into the smoker) so I can get that long and sustained cook. Anything else gets lump. I want to taste wood smoke rather than glue smoke.

But when I do use briquettes, it’s Kingsford blue.
This post was edited on 7/25/18 at 6:38 am
Posted by Captain Ray
Member since Nov 2016
1589 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 3:19 pm to
If I am gonna use briquettes I will use Royal oak it burns steady and long and is cheaper than kingsford. When ya clean out ya pit kingsford leaves lots of sandy ash Royal oak not near so much
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram