Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

New water heater cost - Is this high?

Posted on 12/13/24 at 5:34 pm
Posted by TigerGrl73
Nola
Member since Jan 2004
21356 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 5:34 pm
Wanting to proactively replace a nearly 25 year old 80 gallon electric water heater in our condo. Plumber quoting about $6600 for a Ruud ELD 80 gallon, removal of old heater, replacing water pan. Fair or not?
Posted by Drop4Loss
Birds Eye Of Deaf Valley
Member since Oct 2007
3967 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 5:48 pm to
Lets see
$1500 for the heater
$500 to remove old
So $4,300 for 3 hours work ?
frick no
Posted by hawgndodge
Member since Jun 2009
5108 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 6:18 pm to
That's a "I really don't want to do this job for you" quote
Posted by T-Jon
Member since Jan 2012
32 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 6:19 pm to
Should be around $3000 with an expansion tank. There might be some other issues bumping the price like it’s installed in a limited access/tight location. Or he doesn’t want to carry 2 ea 80gallon water heaters without significant compensation. You might not need an 80gallon. Water heaters have improved their performance over the last 25 years.
Posted by baseballmind1212
Missouri City
Member since Feb 2011
3345 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 6:47 pm to
Can you get away from the 80 gal unit?

Units bigger than 50 gallons are considered commercial units now since the energy codes changed a few years ago. So they are built to more stringent codes

An 80 gallon NG water heater is about 3-4x of a residential 50 gallon water heater.
Posted by Goldensammy
Cypress, TX
Member since Jun 2016
875 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 6:53 pm to
80 gallon for a condo? Good lawd... How many folks you got living there? Price seems way too damn high. You could convert to tankless for less. A basic, 50-g can be had for under $1k.
Posted by TigerGrl73
Nola
Member since Jan 2004
21356 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:05 pm to
We could go 50. The place had 80 when we purchased 14 years ago. The guy probably came in, saw 80, and just assumed he could sell an 80. We aren't even there full time.

I would love tankless but it would have to be electric and I'm pretty sure we would need to add a panel for that. And I'm not sure how that would affect the load on the building. I was under the impression it wouldn't work.
Posted by Yewkindewit
Near Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
21030 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:33 pm to
If it is not in the attic and it is accessible without a huge effort, look at DIY. Mine sits in a closet in the basement and one of my sons and I slid the old one out, new one in, slid the old one on a trailer and then hauled it off.

I happen to have the easiest path for replacement.

$6600 sounds really high.
Posted by weadjust
Member since Aug 2012
15479 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 7:34 pm to
Cost on that water heater at Menards is about $3K. Plus sales tax and the plumber probably adds 25% or more markup on parts. $6600 is still high.

Where is the condo located?
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22356 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

You might not need an 80gallon. Water heaters have improved their performance over the last 25 years.


Not electric. Basically the same thing. Anyone else saying “just put in on demand” in a condo is fairly clueless, thats not how it works.

I made a similar thread recently. The government bullshite has skyrocketed any water heaters over 50 gallons. A 50 gallon tank is around $600 but a 65-80 is $2500-3000 and that’s from a plumber supply without anything added.

So is $6600 high? Yeah for sure, but $4000 or so is likely reasonable. If it’s 25 years old they should likely replace a lot of the plumbing to and from the tank which in a condo can be a pain.

Plumbers for this type of work have started to just move to ridiculous one price quotes instead of parts plus labor.
This post was edited on 12/13/24 at 8:31 pm
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
36156 posts
Posted on 12/13/24 at 10:15 pm to
Agree with this. Where is it located as well? I relocated a smaller one iut of my ceiling and had them change to pex
Posted by TigerGrl73
Nola
Member since Jan 2004
21356 posts
Posted on 12/14/24 at 6:05 am to
quote:

That's a "I really don't want to do this job for you" quote

They work in our building for others so I think it's more of a "we know the other owners don't know what things are supposed to cost so why would these people" thing. And it's Nola. So there's that too.

We're going to see what they say about a smaller unit.

Thanks for confirming my suspicions.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22356 posts
Posted on 12/14/24 at 6:39 am to
80s were standard in the 90s as, why not?

The question about an 80 is how many are going to routinely shower in a similar time? Do you have any large tubs to fill? If you have a large tub a 50 won’t suffice.

I’ve been involved with family members replacing some 80s with a 50+ booster and they really aren’t very good. Multiple plumbers told us otherwise, so just an fyi it’s not an ideal option.

ETA: if you have the space, it’s not out of question to do 2 -40s or 2 -50s.
This post was edited on 12/14/24 at 6:41 am
Posted by dalefla
Central FL
Member since Jul 2024
1893 posts
Posted on 12/14/24 at 9:44 am to
If you had natural gas I'd recommend a tankless at that cost. Electric tankless are not efficient enough to consider, IMO. I'd do it myself before I'd pay $500 an hour for labor because that's what that quote is.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
58272 posts
Posted on 12/14/24 at 10:07 am to
Yes, that sounds high. But it is also an extra large water heater, and there may be some issues that make the installation more difficult
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
21133 posts
Posted on 12/14/24 at 7:50 pm to
Get second quote
Posted by td1
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
3063 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Electric tankless are not efficient enough to consider, IMO


All electric heaters are 100% efficient bc 100% of the power going into them is converted to heat.

But I know your point: they use a lot of electricity, and NG is cheaper to operate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram