- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

ChatGPT Analysis Says No Catchers Balk
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:58 pm
Analysis of Catcher’s Actions:
1. Catcher’s Positioning:
• The catcher must remain within the catcher’s box until the pitch is released.
• The catcher cannot block the plate without possession of the baseball.
2. Frames Evaluation:
• Frame 1: Initial positioning, check if the catcher is within the box.
• Frame 2-3: Catcher’s movement as the pitch is being delivered.
• Frame 4-5: Catcher’s positioning relative to the plate and the ball.
Visual Analysis Summary:
Based on the frames you provided earlier:
• The catcher seems to be maintaining a position behind the plate initially.
• As the ball approaches, the catcher moves forward, possibly to field the pitch.
Conclusion:
If the catcher only blocks the plate after gaining possession of the ball, he does not commit a catcher’s balk. The critical factors are:
• Timing of the catcher’s movement relative to the pitch.
• The catcher’s position in relation to the ball and the plate.
Given these points, it appears the catcher did not commit a balk since he seems to have blocked the plate only after catching the ball. If you have specific moments or stills that suggest otherwise, please provide them for a more accurate analysis.
1. Catcher’s Positioning:
• The catcher must remain within the catcher’s box until the pitch is released.
• The catcher cannot block the plate without possession of the baseball.
2. Frames Evaluation:
• Frame 1: Initial positioning, check if the catcher is within the box.
• Frame 2-3: Catcher’s movement as the pitch is being delivered.
• Frame 4-5: Catcher’s positioning relative to the plate and the ball.
Visual Analysis Summary:
Based on the frames you provided earlier:
• The catcher seems to be maintaining a position behind the plate initially.
• As the ball approaches, the catcher moves forward, possibly to field the pitch.
Conclusion:
If the catcher only blocks the plate after gaining possession of the ball, he does not commit a catcher’s balk. The critical factors are:
• Timing of the catcher’s movement relative to the pitch.
• The catcher’s position in relation to the ball and the plate.
Given these points, it appears the catcher did not commit a balk since he seems to have blocked the plate only after catching the ball. If you have specific moments or stills that suggest otherwise, please provide them for a more accurate analysis.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:01 pm to toothdoc78
ChatGPT has never watched a baseball game in its life
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:01 pm to toothdoc78
Sec Umps have a LOT of explaining to do. Especially after initial call was OUT then USC coach asks for “interference” and he gets it on a “non-reviewable” play.
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:08 pm to Meauxjeaux
It took the known size of plate, and several other known size factors into consideration while watching each frame separately of the ball being released vs. catchers movement.
It’s about the most objective analysis you could get I think bc it doesn’t care about the outcome. It’s just trying to answer the questions asked of it.
It’s about the most objective analysis you could get I think bc it doesn’t care about the outcome. It’s just trying to answer the questions asked of it.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:14 pm to toothdoc78
ChatGPT had some crazy theory about Alabama claiming too many football titles and it is forever confused by the Aggies have a natty trophy with a blank date on it.
this is why no computer will ever completely take over mankind. i mean…
1. computers can’t understand pussy
2. computers can’t understand Bama natty claims.
3, Computers definitely can't understand Finebaun callers.
so what the hell are they even good for?
this is why no computer will ever completely take over mankind. i mean…
1. computers can’t understand pussy
2. computers can’t understand Bama natty claims.
3, Computers definitely can't understand Finebaun callers.
so what the hell are they even good for?
Posted on 5/26/24 at 7:11 am to Russianblue
quote:
ChatGPT had some crazy theory about Alabama claiming too many football titles
Sounds like it knows sports.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:51 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:ChatGPT has watched every baseball game it is capable of watching
ChatGPT has never watched a baseball game in its life
Popular
Back to top
