Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

ChatGPT Analysis Says No Catchers Balk

Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:58 pm
Posted by toothdoc78
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2017
73 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 9:58 pm
Analysis of Catcher’s Actions:

1. Catcher’s Positioning:
• The catcher must remain within the catcher’s box until the pitch is released.
• The catcher cannot block the plate without possession of the baseball.
2. Frames Evaluation:
• Frame 1: Initial positioning, check if the catcher is within the box.
• Frame 2-3: Catcher’s movement as the pitch is being delivered.
• Frame 4-5: Catcher’s positioning relative to the plate and the ball.

Visual Analysis Summary:

Based on the frames you provided earlier:

• The catcher seems to be maintaining a position behind the plate initially.
• As the ball approaches, the catcher moves forward, possibly to field the pitch.

Conclusion:

If the catcher only blocks the plate after gaining possession of the ball, he does not commit a catcher’s balk. The critical factors are:

• Timing of the catcher’s movement relative to the pitch.
• The catcher’s position in relation to the ball and the plate.

Given these points, it appears the catcher did not commit a balk since he seems to have blocked the plate only after catching the ball. If you have specific moments or stills that suggest otherwise, please provide them for a more accurate analysis. 
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
43331 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:01 pm to
ChatGPT has never watched a baseball game in its life
Posted by LafTiger
Member since Dec 2008
1428 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:01 pm to
Sec Umps have a LOT of explaining to do. Especially after initial call was OUT then USC coach asks for “interference” and he gets it on a “non-reviewable” play.
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 10:11 pm
Posted by toothdoc78
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2017
73 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:08 pm to
It took the known size of plate, and several other known size factors into consideration while watching each frame separately of the ball being released vs. catchers movement.
It’s about the most objective analysis you could get I think bc it doesn’t care about the outcome. It’s just trying to answer the questions asked of it.
Posted by Russianblue
Member since Nov 2007
1253 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:14 pm to
ChatGPT had some crazy theory about Alabama claiming too many football titles and it is forever confused by the Aggies have a natty trophy with a blank date on it.

this is why no computer will ever completely take over mankind. i mean…
1. computers can’t understand pussy
2. computers can’t understand Bama natty claims.
3, Computers definitely can't understand Finebaun callers.

so what the hell are they even good for?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
75278 posts
Posted on 5/26/24 at 7:11 am to
quote:

ChatGPT had some crazy theory about Alabama claiming too many football titles


Sounds like it knows sports.

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
79330 posts
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:51 am to
quote:

ChatGPT has never watched a baseball game in its life
ChatGPT has watched every baseball game it is capable of watching
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram