- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should Ed Orgeron's ex-wife receive money from his LSU buyout?Louisiana's SC to decide
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:21 pm
LINK
quote:
Former LSU football coach Ed Orgeron’s divorce case will go before the Louisiana Supreme Court to determine whether his former wife is owed money from his multimillion dollar contracts and buyout with the university.
Orgeron filed for divorce from his wife, Kelly, in 2020 shortly after winning the College Football National Championship. Kelly Orgeron responded by filing a petition in St. Tammany Parish asking for spousal support and division of their assets, including money that Ed Orgeron received from LSU coaching contracts.
But as the divorce proceedings continued, Orgeron was fired from LSU with a $17 million buyout. So far, the courts have ruled that Kelly Orgeron is not entitled to that money because he started receiving it after the two had separated.
She has appealed, and the Louisiana Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear arguments on the case.
41
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:23 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Hand her a million or two is my take on it. 
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:24 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
He spent that money
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:24 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Has O burned through all his cash yet ?
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:24 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Kelly stacked
O fricked
O fricked
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:34 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is really a bad look for O.
The payment was for a contractual obligation earned during their marriage and I have little doubt she paid a high price to put him in a position to get that contract.
The payment was for a contractual obligation earned during their marriage and I have little doubt she paid a high price to put him in a position to get that contract.
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:36 pm to Yewkindewit
Yes…they were married when he signed the contract with the expectation to complete it
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:37 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I'm sure this eminent group of learned jurists will make a wise decision.
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:41 pm to Jim bean xxx
It’s your property at the time you earn it.
at the time he “earned” this money, they weren’t married.
i’d be shocked if they gave her any.
at the time he “earned” this money, they weren’t married.
i’d be shocked if they gave her any.
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:41 pm to nitwit
Community property state
She may be entitled up to half. The real winners here will be attorneys
She may be entitled up to half. The real winners here will be attorneys
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:49 pm to 756
I wonder if Rosy Finch Boyz LLC has something to say about this?
This post was edited on 11/27/24 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:51 pm to WhoGeaux
It’s Louisiana, he’s f’cked in divorce proceedings
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:52 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Coach O about to go back to coaching d line
Posted on 11/27/24 at 5:56 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
She should get half of it.
Posted on 11/27/24 at 6:03 pm to Reagan80
Some people here really hate Coach O for proving them wrong and putting together the greatest college football team ever.
Posted on 11/27/24 at 6:04 pm to nitwit
If he was getting paid this money as a salary for work done after the divorce, she wouldn't be entitled to any part of it. The income would be his separate property.
He's just getting paid to not work. His salary was guaranteed.
He's just getting paid to not work. His salary was guaranteed.
Posted on 11/27/24 at 6:11 pm to Epaminondas
It’s a guarantee payout, but under certain conditions. He has to perform the post termination conditions to “earn”. My belief is that the LASC will rely on this to rule that its post termination separate property. O and only O can perform the personal obligations to “earn” the money.
Posted on 11/27/24 at 6:12 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Too late it was all spent in Destin
Posted on 11/27/24 at 6:16 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Precedent says Republican justices will side with the husband over the woman. #MAGA
Posted on 11/27/24 at 6:30 pm to BayouBaw84
I don’t hate O, but community property applies to salary and would apply here unless she surrendered her right in the divorce.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News