- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rule Of Thumb For Mortgage
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:07 pm
Obviously, this is different for everybodys budget.
What’s normal for someone with no debt? Someone that makes 50k/year is going to be different vs someone who makes 180k/year. What are the rules/Guidelines you guys advise?
Examples:
1)Dave Ramsey says no more than 25% of net income
2) 4x Yearly Salary
3) What the lender qualifies you for minus 10%
4) Household should spend a maximum of 28% of its gross monthly income on total housing expenses and no more than 36% on total debt service
What’s normal for someone with no debt? Someone that makes 50k/year is going to be different vs someone who makes 180k/year. What are the rules/Guidelines you guys advise?
Examples:
1)Dave Ramsey says no more than 25% of net income
2) 4x Yearly Salary
3) What the lender qualifies you for minus 10%
4) Household should spend a maximum of 28% of its gross monthly income on total housing expenses and no more than 36% on total debt service
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:23 pm to pioneerbasketball
What is the purpose of the question?
Are you buying a home?
Talking with a financial planner?
Talking with friends?
Are you buying a home?
Talking with a financial planner?
Talking with friends?
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:25 pm to pioneerbasketball
Use all four you listed and create a football field of reasonable estimates.
This post was edited on 5/31/21 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:35 pm to lynxcat
1, 3, and 4 are virtually the same rule.
#2 ignores debt ratios. It is akin to "tradition" or aphorisms.
#2 ignores debt ratios. It is akin to "tradition" or aphorisms.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:57 pm to pioneerbasketball
quote:
4x Yearly Salary
This does not sound like a good one at all. I think it could apply to lower incomes, but someone making $250k has no business buying a million dollar home.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 1:59 pm to GEAUXT
I find most people use these rules of thumb to justify spending more than they should on a house. In particular, the gross income %. That is a really bad way to budget as it does not account for their other expenses.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 2:08 pm to GEAUXT
Use 1 or be house poor. My monthly payment is 15% my net and any higher would hurt my every day lifestyle. But then again I enjoy 3-4 vocations a year, eat out 3ish times a year. Season tickets to LSU football and basketball.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 2:14 pm to pioneerbasketball
quote:
4x Yearly Salary

Posted on 5/31/21 at 2:17 pm to tigerbacon
quote:
eat out 3ish times a year
Ok mr moneybags
Posted on 5/31/21 at 2:22 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
The old adage was 2.5x gross income. I guess that's been blown out of the water these days though.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 3:23 pm to GEAUXT
quote:
This does not sound like a good one at all. I think it could apply to lower incomes, but someone making $250k has no business buying a million dollar home
I don’t find it to be that unreasonable. I don’t make near $250k but I’d assume that if you pull that in per year you could come up with quite a down payment and be able to afford the monthly payment.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 5:14 pm to pioneerbasketball
quote:
Household should spend a maximum of 28% of its gross monthly income on total housing expenses and no more than 36% on total debt service
Probably a good thing to do the math on at least.
But if you are actually making a budget and sticking to it you can work from there.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 7:12 pm to fallguy_1978
Things (homes and other expenses) have exponentially increased over the years.
I know people without debt that put away 12-15% a month for retirement with no debt and still manage to have a mortgage payment around 35% of their take home pay and they’re doing just fine. I’d be worried over 40% though.
I know people without debt that put away 12-15% a month for retirement with no debt and still manage to have a mortgage payment around 35% of their take home pay and they’re doing just fine. I’d be worried over 40% though.
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:07 pm to pioneerbasketball
I don’t understand the idea of figuring out what your max mortgage should be. I would think about this as what is the best deal you can get for what you need. How big a house do you need? How many kids determines things like minimum bathrooms and bedrooms needed. Once you figure out what you need I would try to find a house that meets your needs for no more than $150 a square foot and closer to $100 is better. This number definitely should not be more than 25% of net but lower is much better. Being house poor sucks and makes you financially vulnerable to any disruption of income. You should be saving 25% of net income, not spending it on housing.
I make good money and bought my primary home for less than what I make a year. I bought my first home for a little less than twice my yearly income at that time. Spending 4 times my income on a home seems insane to me and you definitely will not be able to save significantly.
I make good money and bought my primary home for less than what I make a year. I bought my first home for a little less than twice my yearly income at that time. Spending 4 times my income on a home seems insane to me and you definitely will not be able to save significantly.
This post was edited on 5/31/21 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 5/31/21 at 10:19 pm to pioneerbasketball
I'm comfortable with about 10% of net income including utilities, taxes, and insurance. I'd be pretty uncomfortable at 25% of net. I'm fortunate to have a pretty high household income. I'd think folks in the average earning range have to really stretch to get a decent house these days.
Posted on 6/1/21 at 12:21 pm to pioneerbasketball
My rule was always a (very) conservative 2X my gross annual salary (excl bonuses).
Posted on 6/1/21 at 12:33 pm to Drizzt
quote:
I would think about this as what is the best deal you can get for what you need. How big a house do you need? How many kids determines things like minimum bathrooms and bedrooms needed. Once you figure out what you need I would try to find a house that meets your needs for no more than $150 a square foot and closer to $100 is better. This number definitely should not be more than 25% of net but lower is much better. Being house poor sucks and makes you financially vulnerable to any disruption of income. You should be saving 25% of net income, not spending it on housing.
i think this day an age those factors are important, but the issue that drives the decision is more about "safe neighborhood/safe area
i think people have a dollar amount they feel comfortable with, and then a " how much higher can i go, to get a safer location"
that is where the "max' threshold is at....
Posted on 6/1/21 at 12:43 pm to pioneerbasketball
In the end it's simply about seeing what cash flow monthly you need and getting to that number (or frankly better than that number) adding in a mortgage/escrow/hoa etc...
Why the gross income rule (Even with the debt adder) cant necessarily work is some people save way more than others.
Take 2 different couples here, both make $100k combined ($50k/ea to make it simple) and looking to make first home purchase. This is $8.3k gross a month. Let's say simply after non retirement benefits at work, their net is $6k a month from that with taxes (state of GA used here)/health benefits taken out. Both couples have no other debt (ideal scenario) and spend about $3k a month on various non-household related things. So they both have about $3k after all that at this point.
Both couples have employers who match 50% up to 6% of their 401k, so they contribute 6% to get that 3% match. 1 couple stops there in terms of saving for retirement, so they now have about $2.5k leftover for household related expenses. The other couple are better retirement savers and on top of that 6% contribution to their 401k save $500/mo each to IRAs, so they have only $1.5k a month leftover for household related expenses.
So just that 1 difference there makes a pretty significant housing difference in what they can "Afford" as 1 couple can do $2.5k/mo and the other $1.5k/mo despite making the exact same amount of money.
So basically first couple could comfortably afford a much more significantly higher priced house than couple 2 due to their cash flow they have each month simply from the difference in retirement savings. In the end it's really about that monthly cash flow, realizing that, and sticking to BELOW that number in housing related expenses.
Most of the time though, it's not even the mortgage, taxes or insurance that gets people, it's the repairs/maintenance that people dont budget for in homes. Easy to sit here and figure out a mortgage/taxes/insurance for a house, not as easy to know how much money you'll need and when exactly for repairs/maintenance.
Why the gross income rule (Even with the debt adder) cant necessarily work is some people save way more than others.
Take 2 different couples here, both make $100k combined ($50k/ea to make it simple) and looking to make first home purchase. This is $8.3k gross a month. Let's say simply after non retirement benefits at work, their net is $6k a month from that with taxes (state of GA used here)/health benefits taken out. Both couples have no other debt (ideal scenario) and spend about $3k a month on various non-household related things. So they both have about $3k after all that at this point.
Both couples have employers who match 50% up to 6% of their 401k, so they contribute 6% to get that 3% match. 1 couple stops there in terms of saving for retirement, so they now have about $2.5k leftover for household related expenses. The other couple are better retirement savers and on top of that 6% contribution to their 401k save $500/mo each to IRAs, so they have only $1.5k a month leftover for household related expenses.
So just that 1 difference there makes a pretty significant housing difference in what they can "Afford" as 1 couple can do $2.5k/mo and the other $1.5k/mo despite making the exact same amount of money.
So basically first couple could comfortably afford a much more significantly higher priced house than couple 2 due to their cash flow they have each month simply from the difference in retirement savings. In the end it's really about that monthly cash flow, realizing that, and sticking to BELOW that number in housing related expenses.
Most of the time though, it's not even the mortgage, taxes or insurance that gets people, it's the repairs/maintenance that people dont budget for in homes. Easy to sit here and figure out a mortgage/taxes/insurance for a house, not as easy to know how much money you'll need and when exactly for repairs/maintenance.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 6/1/21 at 12:50 pm to Drizzt
quote:
no more than $150 a square foot and closer to $100 is better.
I don't know where you live, but that's not buying much house, especially in some areas of the country.
Posted on 6/1/21 at 12:54 pm to pioneerbasketball
Under 25-30% of net income is a good start without any variables of other debt. To keep it simple, also not including here job security, likeliness to move or current market outlook.
Obviously there's more than one way to skin a chicken, but to me this is a good baseline to start. My wife and I are around 24% of net income towards PITI (no other debt except a few more payments on her car) currently but still put a good bit extra each month because that's what we are comfortable with and want to finish the note in under 20 years if possible for our personal peace of mind. This is also after maxing retirement and where we plan to raise our family.
This is extremely difficult to do in the lower ranges so I imagine you do well for yourself like you said.
Obviously there's more than one way to skin a chicken, but to me this is a good baseline to start. My wife and I are around 24% of net income towards PITI (no other debt except a few more payments on her car) currently but still put a good bit extra each month because that's what we are comfortable with and want to finish the note in under 20 years if possible for our personal peace of mind. This is also after maxing retirement and where we plan to raise our family.
quote:
I'm comfortable with about 10% of net income including utilities, taxes, and insurance. I'd be pretty uncomfortable at 25% of net. I'm fortunate to have a pretty high household income. I'd think folks in the average earning range have to really stretch to get a decent house these days.
This is extremely difficult to do in the lower ranges so I imagine you do well for yourself like you said.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 12:57 pm
Popular
Back to top
