- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Drafting Multiple QBs in the same year
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:37 pm
I've believed for a while this is a good strategy for teams. You can't be good without a QB. Draft a bunch one year, play the numbers game, and let them shake out.
The situation with Deion could be a problem, but in a vacuum it's solid.
The situation with Deion could be a problem, but in a vacuum it's solid.
14
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:38 pm to KosmoCramer
I heard a stat that something like 58 QBs started an NFL game last year. There is a need to have a couple.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:40 pm to KosmoCramer
Looking at Cleveland's depth chart this does provide more depth, but quality over quantity it is not.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:42 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
I've believed for a while this is a good strategy for teams. You can't be good without a QB. Draft a bunch one year, play the numbers game, and let them shake out.
This is really idiotic lol
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:44 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
I've believed for a while this is a good strategy for teams. You can't be good without a QB. Draft a bunch one year, play the numbers game, and let them shake out.
Sometimes I wonder how some front offices can be so dumb, and then I read shite like this and realize how much more dumb some people can be. Incredible stuff
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:46 pm to TackySweater
quote:
TackySweater
quote:
This is really idiotic lol
quote:
Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Sometimes I wonder how some front offices can be so dumb, and then I read shite like this and realize how much more dumb some people can be. Incredible stuff
Couldn't have asked for a better verification that I'm right
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:48 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Couldn't have asked for a better verification that I'm right
I mean. You typed it out. Imagine actually thinking what you said in the OP is a good strategy lol
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:54 pm to TackySweater
You would agree that an NFL team can't be good without a franchise QB, right?
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:56 pm to KosmoCramer
This is not a bad strategy in a year with a deep pool of qb prospects.
Terrible strategy this year with one of the weakest qb draft class ever.
Terrible strategy this year with one of the weakest qb draft class ever.
This post was edited on 4/26/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:57 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
You would agree that an NFL team can't be good without a franchise QB, right
49ers. Got to two SBs with two different average QBs
This post was edited on 4/26/25 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:59 pm to KosmoCramer
It's going to be interesting to see how it plays out and who they keep.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:01 pm to KosmoCramer
I don't mind picking two qbs but why not just take him in the 3rd if you wanted a qb.
There is no way they had Gabriel graded higher.
There is no way they had Gabriel graded higher.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:09 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
You would agree that an NFL team can't be good without a franchise QB, right?
They drafted two QBs that need to develop, both can’t get enough reps to develop, in fact, it’s almost certain both can’t even be on the roster with their current QBs on they have.
So tell me how this is such a great idea
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:11 pm to KosmoCramer
I’d rather take my chances on a QB in rounds 3-5 than the first round.
It’s a crapshoot who will pan out.
It’s a crapshoot who will pan out.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:13 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
I’d rather take my chances on a QB in rounds 3-5 than the first round.
It’s a crapshoot who will pan out.
It's a monumentally bigger crapshoot in rds 3-5. Like basically a 40% chance vs 4%.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:14 pm to Chalkywhite84
quote:
There is no way they had Gabriel graded higher.
Of course they did
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:16 pm to KosmoCramer
Cowboys Troy Aikman and Steve Walsh
Redskins RG3 and Kirk Cousins
Broncos Matt Mauck and Bradlee Van Pelt
Packers Brian Brohm and Matt Flynn
49ers took Giovanni Carmazzi and Tim Ratty, one before one after Tom Brady
Redskins RG3 and Kirk Cousins
Broncos Matt Mauck and Bradlee Van Pelt
Packers Brian Brohm and Matt Flynn
49ers took Giovanni Carmazzi and Tim Ratty, one before one after Tom Brady
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:20 pm to TigerintheNO
Another point to add, DeShaun Watson is signed through 2029 I believe.
They need a rookie QB to hit to have any chance this decade.
They need a rookie QB to hit to have any chance this decade.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:22 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Another point to add, DeShaun Watson is signed through 2029 I believe. They need a rookie QB to hit to have any chance this decade.
I believe they restructured the deal where they can cut him after this season
Posted on 4/26/25 at 2:22 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
You would agree that an NFL team can't be good without a franchise QB, right?
Sure lol.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News