- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Le'Veon Bell denies rape allegations made by cousin after victim is awarded $25 million
Posted on 3/11/25 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 3/11/25 at 3:29 pm
quote:
Despite a recent $25 million default judgement against him, former NFL running back Le’Veon Bell is “adamantly” denying rape claims made by a female relative that allegedly began when she was as young as six years old, according to TMZ.
Jada Bell, reportedly Le’Veon’s cousin eight years his junior, filed a civil lawsuit in his hometown of Franklin County, Ohio, back in March 2024 alleging the 33-year-old former Michigan State and Pittsburgh Steelers running back began a decade-long nonconsensual and incestual relationship with her that allegedly lasted until she turned 18.
According to the suit, as viewed by TMZ, Jada Bell claims her older cousin would use “slang terms” like “fire” to direct her, as a minor, to perform sexual acts on him such as oral sex.
Jada Bell’s suit alleges the abuse continued throughout “his college years and beyond” whenever Le’Veon would return to Ohio, until she reached adulthood.
A Franklin County judge issued a default judgement in Jada Bell’s favor in October 2024, ruling Le’Veon Bell was “served according to law and failed to move, plead, or otherwise appear in this action.” Jada Bell was then awarded $25 millon in damages two weeks ago at the conclusion of a jury trial that was held in Le’Veon Bell’s absence.
The former running back-turned-boxer’s attorney, Thomas W. Shaffer, recetly told TMZ “my client adamantly denies any and all allegations that have been lodged against him. Further, he was never served with a civil complaint or any documents.” Shaffer added Bell wasn’t even living in Ohio when he was purportedly served.
“The default judgment granted was based upon violations of his Fifth Amendment rights of due process for failing to be served,” Shaffer told TMZ. “My client is in the process of filing a motion to open and reverse the default judgment because the narratives of the case have never been litigated.”
LINK
Posted on 3/11/25 at 3:33 pm to Bench McElroy
Man, he and Brown fell off the map by being divas.
you hate to see it.
you hate to see it.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 3:35 pm to Bench McElroy
Is this something new because I never heard of this until now.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 3:37 pm to Bench McElroy
Smells like the plaintiff's attorney bypassed service to get this out in the public eye and force a settlement
Posted on 3/11/25 at 7:55 pm to The Shaqtus
quote:
Smells like the plaintiff's attorney bypassed service to get this out in the public eye and force a settlement
Would’ve had to at the very least faked the service or the judge wouldn’t have granted the default.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 6:16 am to Bench McElroy
That Pittsburgh Steelers huddle with him and Big Ben...usually 1 in 5 males are the victim.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 6:21 am to Ash Williams
quote:
Would’ve had to at the very least faked the service or the judge wouldn’t have granted the default.
Not if they have some sort of ad hoc/curator that didn't do a thorough job.
Popular
Back to top
