- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

28 Days Later vs 28 Weeks Later
Posted on 3/5/09 at 2:23 am
Posted on 3/5/09 at 2:23 am
Which movie do you like better?
Posted on 3/5/09 at 2:34 am to Acreboy
I like both. But 28 weeks later gets my vote and that is probably only because I haven't seen 28 days in a while
Posted on 3/5/09 at 2:42 am to DeathBus
Days was a better movie, though both are good.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 2:50 am to Froman
Days was exactly how I envision the zombie apocalypse, but weeks had a better story imo.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 2:54 am to Acreboy
Weeks also has one of the most gut wrenching scenes in horror. The part with the eyeballs.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 6:35 am to Acreboy
days....really didn't like weeks.
SPOILERS
The whole military killing everyone no matter what for most of the movie and the fact that they locked all the folks up with weak arse protection is too absurd for my taste. I can understand the shooting gallery when they are all running out and there is total chaos and they can't afford the hesitation of determining who is infected and who isn't....but when shite settled down that should have stopped.
SPOILERS
The whole military killing everyone no matter what for most of the movie and the fact that they locked all the folks up with weak arse protection is too absurd for my taste. I can understand the shooting gallery when they are all running out and there is total chaos and they can't afford the hesitation of determining who is infected and who isn't....but when shite settled down that should have stopped.
This post was edited on 3/5/09 at 7:44 am
Posted on 3/5/09 at 7:20 am to Acreboy
quote:
but weeks had a better story imo.
you would think that
Posted on 3/5/09 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
Weeks was a massive disappointment. 28 Days LAter followed its own internal logic and had some truly great scenes. Weeks is just a series of action set pieces without any character or story to support it. I enjoyed it, but it was nowhere near as good as Days.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 8:10 am to shutterspeed
quote:
days....really didn't like weeks.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 8:12 am to Acreboy
Like both, but Days is a much better film.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 8:43 am to Freauxzen
Days. Weeks started out ok, especially the opening scene, but there were some things that didn't sit right with me. Like, the military shooting at a driving car. Really? Since when did zombies learn how to drive a car? You know those people aren't infected, but you're going to shoot at them anyway?
And I actually kinda cared about the characters in Days. I watched Weeks recently, and I didn't care one bit when the soldier or doctor died.
And I actually kinda cared about the characters in Days. I watched Weeks recently, and I didn't care one bit when the soldier or doctor died.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 9:45 am to TigerNutwhack
You have to admit, the father killing the wife and constantly attacking his children is pretty f'd up. That part of the story made Weeks good. All in all Days was better, but Weeks is good too.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 10:08 am to tuck
both good but i love zombie movies.
Days was better, the empty London scene is one of the greatest scene is history
Days was better, the empty London scene is one of the greatest scene is history
Posted on 3/5/09 at 10:30 am to TigerNutwhack
quote:
Like, the military shooting at a driving car. Really? Since when did zombies learn how to drive a car? You know those people aren't infected, but you're going to shoot at them anyway?
Exactly my beef with Weeks.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 10:32 am to Acreboy
I loved them both. Days was by far the best, though. But that first scene in weeks... 

Posted on 3/5/09 at 12:48 pm to Acreboy
It was pretty much the same movie.
Virus infects people, people start killing people, virus is contained, end of movie.
I liked it though b/c I'm in to that sort of movie.
Virus infects people, people start killing people, virus is contained, end of movie.
I liked it though b/c I'm in to that sort of movie.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 1:38 pm to Acreboy
The absence of Danny Boyle in 28 weeks later was apparent. 28 days later was suspenseful and scary while 28 weeks later was just another action movie to be placed with all the rest. 28 days later seemed new and refreshing, but 28 weeks later was just the same old stuff.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 1:40 pm to Acreboy
Days.
And it's not even close.
And it's not even close.
Posted on 3/5/09 at 2:05 pm to SaintLSUnAtl
quote:
Virus infects people, people start killing people, virus is contained, end of movie.
You do realize the exact opposite of that occurs in the end of 28 Weeks Later...right?
BTW, apparently they are working on making 28 Months Later
Popular
Back to top
