Started By
Message

Atlanta Journal-Constitution threatens legal action against Richard Jewell film

Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:07 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68288 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:07 pm
quote:

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and editor Kevin Riley are threatening the producers and filmmakers of Clint Eastwood’s “Richard Jewell” over its accusations of “malicious fabrications” in the film, according to a legal demand sent Monday that was obtained by TheWrap.

The letter from the law offices of Lavely & Singer accused the filmmakers as acting “recklessly” and “engaging in constitutional malice” due to the film’s portrayal of the newspaper and AJC reporter Kathy Scruggs (as played by Olivia Wilde). The paper demands that the filmmakers issue a public statement that acknowledges they took dramatic and artistic licenses with the story, and that a prominent disclaimer is added to the film.

“We’re simply asking that the producers issue a statement acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes, and that artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters,” Riley said in a statement to TheWrap. “In addition, we’re requesting a disclaimer to that effect be added to the film’s credits.”


LINK

Hopefully they just pay the lawsuit and forego the after-credits text the AJC wants added onto the film. Also...I find it funny that they want them to do this when they are literally four days away from release. The prints have already been shipped to the theaters.
This post was edited on 12/9/19 at 3:09 pm
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45173 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:09 pm to
I hope Clint tells the paper to suck his dick.

Maybe they shouldn’t have fricked the whole thing up to begin with.
This post was edited on 12/9/19 at 3:10 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123402 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

“We’re simply asking that the producers issue a statement acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes, and that artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters,” Riley said in a statement to TheWrap. “In addition, we’re requesting a disclaimer to that effect be added to the film’s credits.”



"No. File your lawsuit and let's start Discovery."
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
107546 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:09 pm to
Kinda funny how they are all spun up about damage to their reputation...
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81611 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:11 pm to
I would love for Richard Jewell's estate to counter-sue.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
25718 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:16 pm to
Maybe they shouldn't have lied and ruined a man's life.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32000 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:18 pm to
Ah, the irony.

This is Eastwood's final FU to the liberal media (and FBI) who flat out ruined Jewell's name basically because he fit a stereotype
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

its accusations of “malicious fabrications”


Oh? Exactly what they did to Richard Jewel?
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
7127 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

I would love for Richard Jewell's estate to counter-sue.


I believe after he died they finally ruled that the AJC was not liable and the case was dismissed. AJC fought it for years.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
114986 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:40 pm to
That is hilariously ironic
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
19253 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:49 pm to











Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
42703 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

due to the film’s portrayal of the newspaper and AJC reporter Kathy Scruggs (as played by Olivia Wilde)


Two things I can tell you about Kathy Scruggs, a judge sent her to jail for not revealing her source on the story. And she died of a drug overdose, about 20 years ago.
Posted by DFWAggie09
DFW
Member since Oct 2011
1487 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:02 pm to
Pretty sure they're just upset that they showed the reporter sleeping with a source for information. Not that they totally screwed the pooch on the entire thing.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81611 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure they're just upset that they showed the reporter sleeping with a source for information. Not that they totally screwed the pooch on the entire thing.


What's the difference between a whore and a reporter?

One fricks you BEFORE leaving, the other continuously fricks you AFTER leaving.
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
11473 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:44 pm to
No one reads that rag
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
49890 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

some events were imagined for dramatic purposes, and that artistic license and dramatization were used


Kind of like their coverage of Jewell when all this happened?
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Two things I can tell you about Kathy Scruggs, a judge sent her to jail for not revealing her source on the story. And she died of a drug overdose, about 20 years ago.



Did she ever reveal or can we assume she made that shite up?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68288 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Did she ever reveal or can we assume she made that shite up?


She never revealed her source.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:03 pm to
Ah

And then started abusing drugs to numb her pain from ruining a man's life and it killed her.

Good riddance.
Posted by ashy larry
Marcy Projects
Member since Mar 2010
5573 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

or can we assume she made that shite up?


What was possibly made up? I'm not well versed on this, b/c it was so long ago and I haven't thought about it in years. I'm sure the media sensationalized stuff but wasn't Jewell actually being looked at by the FBI? I thought the AJC won the lawsuit ultimately bc the info they reported was deemed to be accurate at the time it was reported. Of course, I could be wrong about this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram