- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Loomis says that Kellen's preferred draft strategy is to build "inside out"
Posted on 4/23/25 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 4/23/25 at 12:52 pm
AKA address lines at a higher rate than skill positions
Basically the same philosophy as Loomis.
Basically the same philosophy as Loomis.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 12:58 pm to Fun Bunch
This is the right mindset especially when you dont have your QB yet.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 12:58 pm to Fun Bunch
Put your money on an OL at 9.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 12:59 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:He corrected himself to add Kellen Moore to that statement. He started out by saying "our philosophy...is to build inside out."
Basically the same philosophy as Loomis.
This is Loomis' show.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 1:21 pm to Fun Bunch
They’re not wrong but maybe it’s time we look at the person doing the evals because our ROI has been piss poor. Our skill positions need addressing are in poor shape too.
It’d be nice to have some cap space so we didn’t need to address all needs via draft…but well
It’d be nice to have some cap space so we didn’t need to address all needs via draft…but well
Posted on 4/23/25 at 1:23 pm to Fun Bunch
Absolutely that's refreshing to hear because that is where you win games on the line.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 1:36 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
Put your money on an OL at 9.
The right thing to do for this draft is to trade back a bit then get a OL. OL is kinda iffy at the top. But knowing us, we are going to trade up to 7 and get an OL
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:12 pm to burke985
Saints already do this and haven’t been winning much
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:22 pm to xScar
It’s the right philosophy unless you do stupid shite like drafting Marcus Davenport and Payton Turner.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:25 pm to Fun Bunch
I don't mind this strategy at all as long as they are not upgrading positions that are ok to good at the expense of addressing holes in areas they are terrible at and have little to no talent.
That does not improve your team. That gives you a great player on a bad team.
i.e. Fragua and Penning are good enough tackles to get you through another year or so. IMO drafting a RT to upgrade Penning does not make your line better because you still have the same holes on the interior.
It doesn't really move the needle on your offense because you still have no WR1 or TE1 and no game changer weapon.
I'd rather see fill the gaping holes you have they tweek and upgrade positions your already good at to make them superior level.
That does not improve your team. That gives you a great player on a bad team.
i.e. Fragua and Penning are good enough tackles to get you through another year or so. IMO drafting a RT to upgrade Penning does not make your line better because you still have the same holes on the interior.
It doesn't really move the needle on your offense because you still have no WR1 or TE1 and no game changer weapon.
I'd rather see fill the gaping holes you have they tweek and upgrade positions your already good at to make them superior level.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:30 pm to Fun Bunch
This might be true, but why would Loomis announce this to everybody so close to the draft? Good chance it's meant to distract from what they're really going to do.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:35 pm to Snipe
Gaping holes at RT, LG, and DE.
If you have a new coach, staff and scheme coming in along with a weak QB room I think it best to start building a great defense. It will win you more games in the short and long term.
If you have a new coach, staff and scheme coming in along with a weak QB room I think it best to start building a great defense. It will win you more games in the short and long term.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:49 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Gaping holes at RT, LG, and DE.
But we really don't have gaping holes at RT and DE just because you don't like Penning and Young/Granderson.
We do have gaping holes at LG, TE and WR
Posted on 4/23/25 at 2:53 pm to Snipe
we don't even have a gaping hole at LG, we signed a 17 game starter. He may be below average starter but it doesn't leave the gaping hole we previously had.
Taysom determines how gaping the TE position is.
I'd say we have a need for a WR that fits a protype but cooks, olave, and shaheed plus whatevers is not necessarily a gaping need, but there's still a need to a degree.
Taysom determines how gaping the TE position is.
I'd say we have a need for a WR that fits a protype but cooks, olave, and shaheed plus whatevers is not necessarily a gaping need, but there's still a need to a degree.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:04 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
we signed a 17 game starter. He may be below average starter but it doesn't leave the gaping hole we previously had.
That's speculation because we have need nothing from this guys in the system.
quote:
Taysom determines how gaping the TE position is.
Taysom is 35 years old coming off a major knee injury at the end of last season. Him playing in 2025 is speculation, Even Loomis said we'll see, its a major injury.
quote:
I'd say we have a need for a WR that fits a protype but cooks, olave, and shaheed plus whatevers is not necessarily a gaping need, but there's still a need to a degree.
What you're going to get out of this WR room is speculation, You hope Olave and Shaheed and return to form from injury shortened season but what are you really counting on? Cooks? A bunch of journeymen and 2nd years players? C'mon, it's a fact we do not have #1 WR and it remains to be seen if we have a true #2 that can stay healthy.
I know everyone looks at it differently but these are the facts. Maybe it all works out good, but the Saints don't have a good track record of things working out good for them in the medical department if you hadn't noticed.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:07 pm to Domeskeller
Absolutely is the right thinking. But Saints gonna draft Shamar Stewart because of his RAS score and pass up talented game breakers. I want a Warren or Jeanty. We need dynamic playmakers on this team badly
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:09 pm to Fun Bunch
Assuming Campbell and Graham are gone. You’ll probably be deciding between Mykel Williams, Jalon Walker, James Pierce Jr., Mike Green, Jihaad Campbell, and Membou. I’m good with any of these
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:09 pm to Snipe
quote:
That's speculation because we have need nothing from this guys in the system.
what the frick are you saying.

quote:
What you're going to get out of this WR room is speculation,
so is speculating what you're getting out of anyone we draft. jesus, what is it you're even typing. i just can't.
Popular
Back to top
