- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Offseason Moves Tracker (LATEST: OG Radunz signed, DB Ugo Amadi returns on 1 yr deal)
Posted on 3/4/25 at 11:09 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 3/4/25 at 11:09 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Cedrick Wilson is an obvious one but not sure about Dallas ties to Kellen matter much
Wilson is an easy cut. They better not keep him.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:20 am to Chalkywhite84
Prepare to see a flurry of moves over the next several days.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 10:33 am to Rand AlThor
Jamaal Williams TYFYS. Multiple players have said when he got the touchdown against the Falcons with Winston, how Dennis Allen handled it afterwards was the start of Dennis Allen's downfall with the players in the locker room.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 5:17 pm to Rand AlThor
McCoy restructured. Estimating around $6.7m in cap space freed up.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 5:43 pm to Rand AlThor
No Brainer.
Easily our best and consistent OL
Easily our best and consistent OL
Posted on 3/5/25 at 6:02 pm to htran90
quote:
Easily our best and consistent OL
Things started to fall apart as soon as we lost him early vs Philly in week 3. Still hard to believe we led that game 3-0 going into the 4th.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 6:12 pm to htran90
He's literally the only slam-dunk restructure on the roster. 

Posted on 3/5/25 at 6:25 pm to Rand AlThor
I know we have had knowledgeable people on here talk up the art of the restructure/extension and its certainly a thing. A good thing. But there comes a time with can kicking you don't have enough contracts to restructure. Then your limited on mid season pickups you will need and extending your good draft picks before they become FA's and then unaffordable.
Do we have the money with our cap and contracts as we like to do them (see above) to compete with most of the league for needed FAs?
Do we have the money with our cap and contracts as we like to do them (see above) to compete with most of the league for needed FAs?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 6:38 pm to goatmilker
Without even doing anything fancy like adding dummy years, just a straight restructuring of the base salaries of Carr, McCoy, and Jordan puts us under the cap, and there are still quite a few other things we can do to get pretty damn far under if we want.
Only chose those 3 in particular because it was the simplest/fewest players to get us under. We can definitely go a lot of different ways.
Edit:
IF Carr does indeed stay, I have a feeling we will see dummy years added to his contract, since we hold some leverage with the bonus due on the 17th and I'm sure he'd rather not get cut and agree to any kind of restructuring that doesn't take current money away.
Only chose those 3 in particular because it was the simplest/fewest players to get us under. We can definitely go a lot of different ways.
Edit:
IF Carr does indeed stay, I have a feeling we will see dummy years added to his contract, since we hold some leverage with the bonus due on the 17th and I'm sure he'd rather not get cut and agree to any kind of restructuring that doesn't take current money away.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 6:43 pm to bonethug0180
Hoping Carr takes a slight pay cut and a restructure
Posted on 3/5/25 at 6:47 pm to Chad504boy
Guys like him usually don't take pay cuts unless the team holds major leverage (which we only hold minor leverage). Or they are just really swell guys...
Just checked and I think I see why we are much more likely to keep than cut Carr.
A restructure (without doing anything fancy) saves us more money this year by a mil than designating him a post June 1st cut. The only argument against is the future money guaranteed, but we are going to have an almost identical cap this year with Carr than without, and it's dumb money to actually have slightly less without a guy than slightly more with a guy.
Edit:
Basically the new coach would have to absolutely hate Carr for us to cut him.
Just checked and I think I see why we are much more likely to keep than cut Carr.
A restructure (without doing anything fancy) saves us more money this year by a mil than designating him a post June 1st cut. The only argument against is the future money guaranteed, but we are going to have an almost identical cap this year with Carr than without, and it's dumb money to actually have slightly less without a guy than slightly more with a guy.
Edit:
Basically the new coach would have to absolutely hate Carr for us to cut him.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 6:52 pm to goatmilker
To answer your question even further, a straight restructuring of Carr, Jordan, Hill, McCoy, Davis, and Ruiz puts us about 18 mil under the cap. So even without doing dummy years on some of these we can have plenty of money for FA if we choose.
I avoided restructuring Ram because that is literally just throwing money away. At best with him we can save 2 mil if he is cut/designated cut post June 1st.
Edit:
Looks like the most we could realistically have without cutting anyone but Ram is 34.6 mil, which knowing how we structure new FA contracts means we could sign 12ish guys plus the rookies if we wanted/went that route.
I avoided restructuring Ram because that is literally just throwing money away. At best with him we can save 2 mil if he is cut/designated cut post June 1st.
Edit:
Looks like the most we could realistically have without cutting anyone but Ram is 34.6 mil, which knowing how we structure new FA contracts means we could sign 12ish guys plus the rookies if we wanted/went that route.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 7:27 pm to Rand AlThor
I like McCoy, but why is he the highest rated center if he played 7 games
Posted on 3/5/25 at 7:29 pm to bonethug0180
Ram will be a post june-1st retirement
Davis still showed his ability to be a plus end LBer, is extending him another year worth it?
As for Jordan, no reason to think a 3-4DE where he eats space couldn't work either. He's never been the fastest, so putting him at 4-3DE vs 3-4DE is a different ask. Anchoring and pushing the pocket to free up someone might be the ideal move (remember he was also considered a "3-4DE" coming out of college.
I'm actually on the train to not touch Ruiz's contract (but they will) so we can consider moving him next year.
I think the next "no duh" restructure will be Carl Granderson, that's value.
Davis still showed his ability to be a plus end LBer, is extending him another year worth it?
As for Jordan, no reason to think a 3-4DE where he eats space couldn't work either. He's never been the fastest, so putting him at 4-3DE vs 3-4DE is a different ask. Anchoring and pushing the pocket to free up someone might be the ideal move (remember he was also considered a "3-4DE" coming out of college.
I'm actually on the train to not touch Ruiz's contract (but they will) so we can consider moving him next year.
I think the next "no duh" restructure will be Carl Granderson, that's value.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 7:37 pm to htran90
Yeah I haven't really sat down and done a should we or shouldn't we with each player, but rather just a quick check to see if players x, y, and z are restructured with no added/dummy years, what would our cap look like.
We can actually avoid touching Ruiz if we have concerns and still have plenty of cap space, for instance. Then there is always the option to restructure him later if we need room down the line.
My guess is we'll get to about 15 mil under, sign a few FAs and the rookie class, then reevaluate. How we get to 15 mil under can be achieved in various ways.
On Jordan in particular, he cannot be cut now, not even if we designate him (because the actual reflection in the cap doesn't happen until June 1st anyway). He would have to actually be cut post June 1st. So my thoughts on him are he will stay another year if he cannot be traded. Doesn't make sense to cut bait otherwise with the way his cap is.
We can actually avoid touching Ruiz if we have concerns and still have plenty of cap space, for instance. Then there is always the option to restructure him later if we need room down the line.
My guess is we'll get to about 15 mil under, sign a few FAs and the rookie class, then reevaluate. How we get to 15 mil under can be achieved in various ways.
On Jordan in particular, he cannot be cut now, not even if we designate him (because the actual reflection in the cap doesn't happen until June 1st anyway). He would have to actually be cut post June 1st. So my thoughts on him are he will stay another year if he cannot be traded. Doesn't make sense to cut bait otherwise with the way his cap is.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 3/8/25 at 4:58 pm to Rand AlThor
Added the Carr restructure....$30.9M estimated savings
Posted on 3/8/25 at 4:59 pm to Rand AlThor
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 3/8/25 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 3/8/25 at 5:02 pm to Rand AlThor
Popular
Back to top
