- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
PFF gave us a C+
Posted on 4/26/25 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 4/26/25 at 10:57 pm
Tied with Browns for 4th worst grade
3 teams with worse grades:
Bengals: C
Vikings: C-
49ers: D
NFCS
Falcons: A-
Panthers: A+
Bucs: B+
3 teams with worse grades:
Bengals: C
Vikings: C-
49ers: D
NFCS
Falcons: A-
Panthers: A+
Bucs: B+
quote:
1 (9): T Kelvin Banks Jr., Texas
Banks — The Saints had been linked to quarterbacks throughout the pre-draft process, but the prudent approach was always to build up the offensive infrastructure to set up their future quarterback for success. Banks allowed the lowest pressure rate (2.1%) of any left tackle in the Power Four over the past two seasons, and did so on more pass-blocking snaps than any other player. He should help keep the pockets cleaner in New Orleans.
2 (40): QB Tyler Shough, Louisville
Shough — After passing on quarterback in the first round, the Saints make Shough the third quarterback off the board. Shough is an older prospect — turning 26 years old in September after entering college in the same recruiting class as Trevor Lawrence and Justin Fields — after working through multiple injuries in his collegiate career. He has NFL size and an NFL arm, coming off a 2024 season at Louisville where he earned a career-best 87.7 PFF passing grade.
3 (71): Dl Vernon Broughton, Texas
Broughton — The Saints took offensive players with their first two selections, but now add an interior defensive lineman. Broughton’s 86.1 PFF grade ranked 12th at the position in 2024. He also brings some interior pass-rush ability, as he put up an 86.3 pass-rush grade last season.
3 (93): S Jonas Sanker, Virginia
Sanker — Effort, energy and a physical mindset as a two-high safety are Sanker’s calling cards. The Virginia safety’s aggressiveness and closing ability allowed him to tally a 15.4% forced incompletion rate and 15 coverage stops in 2024. He has the potential to develop into an NFL starter.
4 (112): LB Danny Stutsman, Oklahoma
Stutsman — Stutsman was a three-year starter for Oklahoma and is one of the more physical players at the position in this class. He struggled in pass coverage throughout his career, but he was a dominant run defender in his senior season, posting a 90.9 PFF grade in that regard this past season.
4 (131): CB Quincy Riley, Louisville
Riley — Riley, the 178th prospect on the PFF Big Board, had a down year in coverage in 2024 but posted a very good 85.3 PFF coverage grade in 2023. He broke up nine passes and tallied two interceptions this past season.
6 (184): RB Devin Neal, Kansas
Neal — Neal posted an elite 90.5 PFF rushing grade in 2024 while averaging 3.73 yards after contact per attempt. He also contributed more than 20 receptions in each of the past three seasons.
7 (248): TE Moliki Matavao, UCLA
Matavao — Matavao caught 41 passes for 506 yards, averaging 12.3 yards per reception. He dropped just one pass all season, finishing with a drop rate of 2.4%.
7 (254): ED Fadil Diggs, Syracuse
Diggs — Diggs transferred from Texas A&M to Syracuse for his final college season, earning a career-best 83.2 PFF pass-rush grade with the Orange. He has the potential to continue to develop, with good size and burst for the position, in the NFL.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 11:04 pm to High Life
quote:
An 87.7 PFF passing grade generally indicates a strong performance, signifying a player is in the "pro-bowl" category, according to PFF's grading system. It suggests the player is capable of being a reliable starter and has the ability to perform consistently well in game situations.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 11:10 pm to High Life
I think that’s underselling our draft. This is one of the better ones we’ve had in the last few years. Wish we grabbed a WR but other than that we added potentially 3 day 1 starters, and up to potentially 6 rotational players that should contribute next season. Our roster blows so not saying we drafted that many absolute studs but fixing holes in your roster is the point of the draft.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 11:11 pm to High Life
We had a good draft in my opinion, we will see 

Posted on 4/26/25 at 11:31 pm to High Life
Our draft was good in my opinion. These “experts” are so shook that we didn’t take Sanders that it’s hard for them to actually address the good picks that were made.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 11:40 pm to supersaints9
quote:
Our draft was good in my opinion. These “experts” are so shook that we didn’t take Sanders that it’s hard for them to actually address the good picks that were made.
PFF grades are auto generated based on rankings and projections. They didn't punish us for passing on Sanders.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 11:47 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
We had a good draft in my opinion, we will see
We really need those mid round guys to hit
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:05 am to High Life
It was a great draft.
At least a B or B+
It was especially good after that absolutely horrible draft the Saints had last year.
At least a B or B+
It was especially good after that absolutely horrible draft the Saints had last year.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:11 am to High Life
quote:Terrible way to do it. "You picked against "expert" projections so your draft sucks."
PFF grades are auto generated based on rankings and projections.
I would respect it if it was based off of actually judging the players picked, not where they were picked vs a generated rankings database.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 2:07 am to bonethug0180
Truth is, draft grades right after the draft are stupid. Nobody knows how these guys are going to perform. Check back in 2-3 years.
This post was edited on 4/27/25 at 2:08 am
Posted on 4/27/25 at 2:13 am to jamal
quote:
. Nobody knows how these guys are going to perform. Check back in 2-3 years.
exactly. in the meantime, PFF will pump out more content at every turn they get.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:07 am to High Life
quote:
PFF grades are auto generated based on rankings and projections. They didn't punish us for passing on Sanders.
Is this the same rankings and projections that gave the team an F for drafting Banks even though the small write up about him seems to believe he will be an immediate impact player
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:18 am to High Life
I got nothing but downvotes for saying our entire division had a better draft. PFF apparently agrees.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:36 am to High Life
Broughton seems too high, there was still value around. Wish we got a Savion here
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:38 am to Weekend Warrior79
Yeah. I feel significantly better about the draft after reading PFF’s descriptions of the individual players that PFF says made us have a bad draft.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:45 am to Mushroom1968
Time will tell but I like the fact that they didn’t reach for anyone in the draft and several players they got great value on.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:46 am to Alatgr
Lol
That's what I got as well.
That's what I got as well.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:52 am to High Life
I'm projecting 5 players who contribute on a roster. 2 of which will be starters by the end of the rookie contract, 1 will 50/50 (Shough), and 2 backups is a good haul in any draft.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:53 am to High Life
I guess its time to melt after this draft.
Posted on 4/27/25 at 7:57 am to High Life
How can pff write such glowing assessments of the individual picks and then grade the Saints so low overall? Dumb
Popular
Back to top
