- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"Post"-Free Agency Draft Needs Thread
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:24 am
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:24 am
While FA really doesn't end, its now been a couple of weeks and its safe to assume most major FA moves for us are done.
Except for QB which is always #1 when you don't have one, what do you think our Team Needs are 1 month from the draft?
I don't think they have changed a whole lot.
WR
Guard
Pass Rush (OLB/DE hybrid)
CB
OT depth
TE
RB
Safety
LB
I think those first 4 are kind of interchangeable. I did take out DT as a "need" since we have more than enough bodies there now, but obviously a game changer at the position is always welcomed.
Except for QB which is always #1 when you don't have one, what do you think our Team Needs are 1 month from the draft?
I don't think they have changed a whole lot.
WR
Guard
Pass Rush (OLB/DE hybrid)
CB
OT depth
TE
RB
Safety
LB
I think those first 4 are kind of interchangeable. I did take out DT as a "need" since we have more than enough bodies there now, but obviously a game changer at the position is always welcomed.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 9:33 am
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:33 am to Fun Bunch
I'd say CB needs to be at the top of "needs".
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:48 am to Fun Bunch
I would agree with the list. I think you can put passrusher, dt, and OG at the top as we just don’t have any depth at all in these areas. Truth is we can use help at every level but the oline and dline are truly what makes good teams good. And we just don’t have it anymore like we used to.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:35 am to RawDog7984
OT, CB, DE, QB. You don't get these guys without using high draft picks. Don't be stupid, grab one of these guys with the first pick. We need all of them.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:35 am to Fun Bunch
Starting from weakest
LG
OLB
DE
Thinest
RB
C
S
T
CB
LG
OLB
DE
Thinest
RB
C
S
T
CB
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:40 am to Fun Bunch
The Chase Young signing was depressing. I was hoping to get a legit pass rusher in the draft. Someone who could actually sack the QB. But that signing makes it less likely we get someone like Williams, Scourton, Green, etc.
My hope is we take Jalon Walker. Maybe generate a pass rush from somewhere.
My hope is we take Jalon Walker. Maybe generate a pass rush from somewhere.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:52 am to Suntiger
I think they still could take a DE first if their guy is there but to me if they are going to run some 3-4 they must draft a starting outside linebacker.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:59 am to Fun Bunch
Round 1: CB/edge
Round 2: CB/edge or G
Round 3: G or CB/edge
Depends on how the draft falls. Team has enough needs to just take BPA
Round 2: CB/edge or G
Round 3: G or CB/edge
Depends on how the draft falls. Team has enough needs to just take BPA
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:08 am to Fun Bunch
We need help everywhere but I think this board often sleeps on how shitty our skilled position depth is compared to almost any good team in the league. It’s like we got spoiled with Brees elevating average talent and now think that any late draft pick/udfa that makes a play or two every once in a while is a viable player.
Olave and Shaheed are solid, relatively one dimensional players both with HUGE recent injury issues. Shaheed may never be the same speed threat anfter his injury ans he approaches his late 20s and Olave is possibly one hit from being out of the league. After that it’s a black hole of aged out or below replacement level talent.
At running back we have a running back past the age where they start to decline (yes I know he is “fresher” than most 30+ year old guys) and literally nothing else. Kendre Miller and his 3.whatever YPC when not injured are considered nothing until he actually does ANYTHING. Juwan Johnson is a good not great relatively one dimensional TE.
We need a major youth and talent infusion at these positions especially when we don’t have a QB that will elevate the talent.
Olave and Shaheed are solid, relatively one dimensional players both with HUGE recent injury issues. Shaheed may never be the same speed threat anfter his injury ans he approaches his late 20s and Olave is possibly one hit from being out of the league. After that it’s a black hole of aged out or below replacement level talent.
At running back we have a running back past the age where they start to decline (yes I know he is “fresher” than most 30+ year old guys) and literally nothing else. Kendre Miller and his 3.whatever YPC when not injured are considered nothing until he actually does ANYTHING. Juwan Johnson is a good not great relatively one dimensional TE.
We need a major youth and talent infusion at these positions especially when we don’t have a QB that will elevate the talent.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 3/25/25 at 12:39 pm to goatmilker
quote:Young and Granderson will be filling those roles mostly, but you are really only looking at having 1 "olb" (Werner) on the field most downs with nickel being so prevalent.
if they are going to run some 3-4 they must draft a starting outside linebacker.
Davis is still going to be the Mike and Werner the Will, even though both will be "ILBs".
On the downs we actually use a 3-4, you'll see Bresee/Jordan in a lot as one DE, Godchaux at NT, and Shepard/Saunders as the other DE, with Young and Granderson at OLB, and Davis and Werner at ILB.
Nickel would be dropping one of the big boys at NT or DE.
I see a much higher need of getting another stand up LB to replace Davis soon (or replace Werner as he replaces Davis if he moves to Mike), or getting a bigger body at DE to replace some of those aging guys than for a pass rusher at OLB since both of those guys are still fairly young.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 3/25/25 at 12:50 pm to Fun Bunch
CB is still the definite highest priority at the moment. We don't have a legit set of 3 starters, only 1 and then a couple of fill in guys.
WR and LG, while not addressed well, was still addressed with guys capable of at least starting for a whole year. These spots shouldn't be ignored, but they now pale in comparison to the gaping holes at CB.
Beyond that we have starters everywhere, but some of those are on the weaker end like WR and LG, while other spots sorely lack depth.
But CB needs to still be addressed before the draft imo, while everything else can take a wait and see approach to how the draft unfolds.
WR and LG, while not addressed well, was still addressed with guys capable of at least starting for a whole year. These spots shouldn't be ignored, but they now pale in comparison to the gaping holes at CB.
Beyond that we have starters everywhere, but some of those are on the weaker end like WR and LG, while other spots sorely lack depth.
But CB needs to still be addressed before the draft imo, while everything else can take a wait and see approach to how the draft unfolds.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:03 pm to Fun Bunch
As far a bodies.
TE needs to be much higher on that list.
TE needs to be much higher on that list.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:27 pm to Suntiger
I want Walker at 9 more than anyone other than Carter. Imo Walker is an edge guy who can also play off ball. But, just because they signed Young doesn’t mean De/ edge isn’t a need. You need a few of these guys and although i like granderson and young neither one of them are game wreckers. They still need another guy.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:30 pm to bonethug0180
If you watched that saints team and don’t think Oline is more of a need than corner than I’m not sure what team you were looking at. Koolaid and Taylor are young and talented. We basically have a dead body at LG with zero depth. We do need a corner but holy shite did anyone watch our interior oline last year?
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:32 pm to RawDog7984
If they're draft for need at #9 they are going to screw it up and reach for a player with at best mid to low round 1 talent. At worst talk themselves into drafting a 2nd or even 3rd round talent.
At #9 you draft the best talent on the board regardless of position.
All these new Saints coaches have said multiple times they coach players not schemes. They will change they're system to match the talent they have. That tells me they value talent over finding someone that fits they're system.
At #9 you draft the best talent on the board regardless of position.
All these new Saints coaches have said multiple times they coach players not schemes. They will change they're system to match the talent they have. That tells me they value talent over finding someone that fits they're system.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:44 pm to RawDog7984
Yes, and a lot of that was from the starters being injured. Same things can be said at any position when you have injuries like that (like look at QB play falling off a cliff with Carr out).
But as it stands currently, not taking future injuries which can't be predicted into account, we have starters with experience at every spot except one of the corner positions (yes Kool-Aid is there, but he doesn't have years of starts, much less half a year), or 2 if you consider nickel is the base with 3 CBs most of the time, meaning we are lacking 2 sure starters at CB compared to every other position at least having someone with multi year experience.
But as it stands currently, not taking future injuries which can't be predicted into account, we have starters with experience at every spot except one of the corner positions (yes Kool-Aid is there, but he doesn't have years of starts, much less half a year), or 2 if you consider nickel is the base with 3 CBs most of the time, meaning we are lacking 2 sure starters at CB compared to every other position at least having someone with multi year experience.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 3:48 pm to Snipe
I didn’t say anything at all about drafting for need at 9. That’s why i don’t want us drafting a guard, corner, or wr there. No player in this draft class at those positions imo are top 10 material.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 4:13 pm to Snipe
quote:
As far a bodies.
TE needs to be much higher on that list.
We do but with what they're paying Juwan now we better not go TE early.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 4:22 pm to Fun Bunch
OT/OG
WR
CB
Olave, Penning and Alontae are in the last year of their deals. You have to look past this season and get a head start on those positions. They’re too expensive for us to afford prime talent in FA.
Drafting for 2025 need is irrelevant to me, this team isn’t going anywhere
WR
CB
Olave, Penning and Alontae are in the last year of their deals. You have to look past this season and get a head start on those positions. They’re too expensive for us to afford prime talent in FA.
Drafting for 2025 need is irrelevant to me, this team isn’t going anywhere
Posted on 3/25/25 at 4:36 pm to Fun Bunch
Instead of just rankings needs, I pondered the how a decent player at that spot affects the team and when they can contribute.
Examples:
- Grey Zabel or Donovan Jackson might step in as starter at LG in year 1.
- Denzel Burke might step into being a starter next year.
- Jalon Walker might supplant Demario Davis/Pete Werner next year/ be a substitute this year.
- Ollie Gordon II/Raheim Sanders can be a short-yardage complement in the backfield this season.
LG - starter in year 1
RB - RB rotation/role in year 1
CB - starter in year 2
LB - starter in year 2
WR - depth piece given the recent injury history/production of current WRs; could be a stater in year 2/3
S - starter in year 2
TE - starter in year 2/3
RT - starter in year 2 (or 1 if Penning is moved/starts regressing)
DL - could be a starter in year 2/3; probably rotation/depth in year 1
I don't know. Just figured it could something a little different and not totally subjective.

Examples:
- Grey Zabel or Donovan Jackson might step in as starter at LG in year 1.
- Denzel Burke might step into being a starter next year.
- Jalon Walker might supplant Demario Davis/Pete Werner next year/ be a substitute this year.
- Ollie Gordon II/Raheim Sanders can be a short-yardage complement in the backfield this season.
LG - starter in year 1
RB - RB rotation/role in year 1
CB - starter in year 2
LB - starter in year 2
WR - depth piece given the recent injury history/production of current WRs; could be a stater in year 2/3
S - starter in year 2
TE - starter in year 2/3
RT - starter in year 2 (or 1 if Penning is moved/starts regressing)
DL - could be a starter in year 2/3; probably rotation/depth in year 1
I don't know. Just figured it could something a little different and not totally subjective.
Popular
Back to top
