Started By
Message

C-130 delivering a tank in a low altitude airdrop

Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:42 pm
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
28069 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:42 pm
Edit:
C-130 hitting the ground hard while using the LAPES (Low Altitude Parachute Extraction System).

I didn't realize how hard the plane hit. Dang.



From the youtube comment section. Apparently this person was involved if you want to read what he said.

quote:

@pm011235
3 days ago
I was involved in this incident. I was one of the crew members of that Sheridan tank, B-55 3/73RD 82ND ABN DIV. My duty was recovering the vehicle after the LAPES. That happened forty eight hours later after the investigators with the Airforce released it to us.

We back-pumped a majority of the fuel out and stripped it down for the riggers the day before, drove it to the rigging building next to Pope Airforce base, set it up on a pallet and loaded the parachutes on, then did push-pull detail at 3AM to get it on that C-130 for this capability exercise. I have 35mm photos that I took of the process including the cockpit and one of the loadmasters who were on the plane when it crashed.

This video footage is reversed left to right, the plane flew the opposite direction in front of the audience. I have all the news video footage of it from each news team there.

What many don’t know is the pilots knew they couldn’t take off after impact, so they steered the plane away from hitting the audience in the bleachers there. This is evidence in this footage as you can see the right wing more down and the left one higher. Plus, you could see the tire tracks and the plane’s fuselage marks on the ground. Why? Because some genius set those bleachers up to curve in the path of the airstrip. Maybe thinking it would be cool to sit there seeing the plane coming at you.

I never saw a LAPES before this, but I knew what was supposed to happen. As it was flying in I initially questioned why it was so high near the extraction zone, and it appeared to be aiming to the second adjacent strip before turning more right toward the one in front of us where it was intended to be going. Also, the drone shoot came out before this happened, and it just seemed wrong to me. Then as it descended it was diving down pretty steep, much like that of a combat landing. Lastly, I didn’t see how it was going to pull up in time to be 5’ to 6’ above the ground for the tank to be pulled out. Fortunately for myself and crew we didn’t fly with the tank as we normally do in a op like this, as I did a year or so after this happened in another platoon and crew.

The drone shoot came out and pulled the three main LAPES shoots out just about the same time it slammed down and bottomed out. The tailgate flew through the LAPES shoots, then the wings flexed hard and nearly touched the ground. As that happened the rear end tail of the plane broke from the rest of the fuselage. The Sheridan tank slid to a stop as the plane cruised by with its wings flapping. It just missed the audience and went into the tree line blowing up on impact. There was a huge fireball of its JP-4. I felt the heat where I was and could smell the fuel as it burned up. That’s when everyone else got it that something went wrong.

After that was panic as people cleared the bleachers and were evacuated from the site. I was ordered to stay with the tank until instructed further with no idea I’d be there over 24 hours guarding it.

One of the guys from my armor unit died after his Jeep was hit by one of the wings of the plane. Another guy from my until jumped out before that happened. Only two Airforce members survived the crash, but died eventually due to their burns.

My tank came out with only one gouge on the loaders hatch and some pieces of the C-130 inside the turret. I kept one for a while after I got out. No idea where it is now. There was never a release of information as to the cause of the crash. I assume pilot error initially, but there may have been a secondary issue with hydraulics being stuck or something. Speculating isn’t evidence or fact though. It just sucked that it happened at all.
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 4:01 pm
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
1547 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:44 pm to
I wonder if that C-130 ever flew again
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
68773 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:49 pm to
Wonder if that’s the Army’s new M10 Booker light tank?



It’s supposed to be being deployed with the 82nd Airborne Division from what I’ve heard.
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2436 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

I wonder if that C-130 ever flew again

I’d think it would be OK. It’s basically a touch-and-go….kinda hard, but probably about as violent as a carrier landing (I know Hercs don’t land on carriers but they are designed to land on some rough terrain).
Posted by goodgrin
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2003
6389 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

I wonder if that C-130 ever flew again



Yeah, I was thinking that was a hard landing for a C-130.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
102132 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I know Hercs don’t land on carriers


Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
68773 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

kinda hard, but probably about as violent as a carrier landing (I know Hercs don’t land on carriers but they are designed to land on some rough terrain).


It’s been done at least once.

Posted by s0tiger
Member since May 2008
842 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:56 pm to


This is what it is supposed to look like.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
102132 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:58 pm to
The plane isn't supposed to touch the ground. That was a crash.

Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2436 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:17 pm to
Yeah those were tests, I guess I should have said that they don’t land on carriers operationally.

But, to my point, that plane in your OP should be fine.
Posted by LSUBFA83
Member since May 2012
3789 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:19 pm to
That looks like the same video in the OP. I guess that plane did NOT fly again.
Posted by canyon
MM23
Member since Dec 2003
20444 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:20 pm to
It crashed and killed everyone.
Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
3553 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:23 pm to
They hit the runway harder than that Delta flight in Canada that ended up on its back.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
9462 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:25 pm to
Spooky bitches.

Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17156 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:26 pm to
The C-130s are beasts. But that was a hard touch and go.
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
7210 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:27 pm to
If anyone had hemorrhoids before that landing they would be in peoples throats now.
Posted by DarkDrifter
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2011
4019 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

I wonder if that C-130 ever flew again


According to the comments in the video that c130 crashed into the nearby woods killing all 4 crew members

Apparently it was a demonstration at Fort Bragg in the mid 80’s
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 3:36 pm
Posted by eitek1
Member since Jun 2011
2609 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:53 pm to
It's called "LAPES". Low Altitudes Parachute Extraction System".

I want to say un the early 90's they had a load get caught on the way out and crashed a plane also. I don't recall if I ever saw a "LAPES" in person. I don't think so. Saw a bunch of "heavy drops" though.
Posted by Turnblad85
Member since Sep 2022
3087 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

I’d think it would be OK. It’s basically a touch-and-go


quote:

The plane isn't supposed to touch the ground. That was a crash.



Note, don't listen to anything about aircraft from the TD user "Dadren"
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
28288 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

The C-130s are beasts. But that was a hard touch and go.


The Herc was always my favorite plane to get hauled around in because it was the one plane I felt confident that could fly hundreds of miles shedding parts and still stay aloft. In my uneducated opinion if something takes a Herc out of the air no airframe in the world would have survived it.


I saw a dozen or so LAPES drop in my day all of them were on demonstration days where family and other civilians were invited to see what we do. The non-deployment times of my service have all blended together but I saw one either at Bragg or Leonard Wood either in the late 80s or in 1990 where two 130s dropped D7 dozers back to back. The first one was textbook, the second never got low enough and when the dozer hit the leading edge dug in and the dozer rolled at least 20 times. I know CATs are tough but I always wondered if that D7 had pushed its last oile of dirt.

You would only use that insertion method if you had to, just like the 82nd normally walks off a plane, but it hit me I hoped my life never depended on a LAPES insertion. The funny thing is I saw everything from Sheridans to HMMWVs paradroped many times and never saw a disastrous finish.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram