re: Eliza Bleu’s Own Friends Aren’t Buying Her Trafficking Story

I don’t have any idea who this person is. But if someone is regretting being an internet thot, then that’s not such a bad thing.

I can also imagine a situation where a young woman is lured by money into pornography but feels like she has lost control almost immediately. It’s the female version of Pinocchio’s Pleasure Island. It’s a trap.

I’d support any woman who wants to remove her nudes from the internet, even if she initially posted them willingly or was paid to do so. Call me old fashioned.

The amount of editing done to that photo should be illegal.

The problem for Eliza is that on multiple occasions she's recorded as saying she auditioned for, got paid for, was excited to be in the video. She's even recorded BRAGGING to her mom that she's IN a video!

She wasn't trafficked, not by any measure shown to date. Yet for some reason Elon is smitten with her. I just don't get it.

With so many receipts showing this (and other vids) were very public domain, I just don't see how Elon/Twitter are getting away with the strikes and locking down of accounts.

It all feels like some weird psyops.

She's taking pics of herself and then claiming to be 'trafficked'.

And more, she's an 'advocate' for trafficking victims.


Like Jeffrey Epstein supported The Girl Scouts of America.

quote:

---

video of her (which she auditioned for and was paid) dancing half naked

---

Bro you know the rules dam!

So I went the rabbit hole on here a while back, after she was suddenly showing up constantly in my twitter feed after Elon took over and she was really trying hard to be a main character.

Everything about her just seemed off. She seemed proud to have been a human trafficking survivor, which is unusual, but I could understand if someone was proud of the survivor put, she seemed equally, if not more, proud of the human tracking part. And it was to the point that when I saw her name, I immediately associated it with her. Which is again, unusual, because even if someone was proud of that, you would still think would people see them as a person who who more than just a traumatic experience.

In addition, they way should flippantly calling people groomers or push QAnonish conspiracy theories about human trafficking, was just weird for someone who went through that. Typically victims get upset over stuff like that, which almost make light of the situation, diminishes the true horrors. But engage is really unusual. Regardless that it was especially odd that I knew she as Eliza Bleu, human trafficking survivor, but I knew nothing about this trafficking experience.

I thought Google might help, because surely that had plenty of information about her as a person and her experience. But again, it was just Eliza Bleu, human tracking survivor, as if she exists solely online and as human trafficking survior. And while I got more information about her story, I don't think I found a single article about it, and it was instead always told on a podcast (I think her own or others) or on a youtube channel. And all seemed to be right-leaning, but more importantly, none seemed to be with anyone who might trying to get more information, but would instead just accept everything as is.

So while skeptical, her stories made more skeptical. They sounded like plots of movies, Taken in particular. And they were very extreme, essentially kidnapping, and of course they were rich and powerful, not some random person. But of course, never any names, and always an excuse not to provide names, which conveniently are details that could allow someone to possibly verify the authenticity of her claims. But any details that one could look into were missing, but yet she even knew the exact dollar amount she was allegedly sold off for.

And type of human trafficking she described that sounds a lot like the Taken plot, exists movies, because real human trafficking that occurs on a daily basis is a lot less salacious. They target the vulnerable and easily manipulative, and it's usually through manipulation and coercion, not kidnapping. And if usually target those who nobody is going to notice is gone like runaways, not middle class people who, if gone missing especially kidnapped, is more likely to be noticed.

But maybe she was just had the unlucky 1 in millions human trafficking experience. BUT HAPPENED TWICE, on halfway across the country the second time. Another kidnapping, another rich and powerful person, and another excuse not to provide names for fear for her life, despite being the exact opposite of you would wanted to do. You either don't go around getting popular telling the experience, so that person is likely to find out, and now knows someone might figure out who he is (either her or someone who start searching) and just let that possibility persist and likely strengthen. The threat is someone figuring out so stopping her before that is when she is really at risk, because if she did say his name, now it's out there. That risk is gone, so doing something would only be purely revenge, but it's hard to get away with it.

Anyways, after all that, I went through social media, and found some twitter threads from 2021, that laid out much of which is in that article. No wonder Eliza Bleu didn't appear to exist other than online as the human trafficking survivor, because person playing Eliza Bleu had spent years all over the place on dating shows, american idol, in music videos, dating popular musicians and causing drama, she just existed in many other names.

But it was Katie Herzog interview that really made it obvious this was all made up, because Katie is pretty anti-woke, so you can't claim it was ideological bias, and she's finally not someone whose just going let these claims be presented without at least asking questions. And Eliza's reaction to merely asking if they could talk about it, suddenly going from proudly making sure everyone knew she's a human trafficking survivor, to how dare you ask a survivor about her experience, I knew she was lying. Then when she lied about the ordeal, then she just showed she was a liar. Not really what you want people to think if you want them to believe you. But of course there were people in the twitter thread going with the "you can't question a survivor; how dare you you make her relive trauma," I stayed out of it. But this so often used by people who want to be the victims and tell everybody about when it's convenient no matter how questionable it is, but ask a question that might clear thing up, now you're taking advantage and targeting a victim. It's often used on the left, but clearly right-wing grifters do it too.

Can I get a tldr version of that?

Is it bad that I don't recognize a single name in that article aside from Musk?