- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:33 pm to tigeraddict
I remember hearing he didn’t take his rheumatoid arthritis meds and his hands swelled
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:36 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Why in Gods name the prosecution didnt then produce a brand new, exact match of the gloves, and have him try those on, boggles the mind
They did, but only after the first pair SNAFU. It was too late.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:39 pm to RFK
quote:
For me, the DNA evidence was irrefutable.
Irrefutably planted.
quote:
OJ’s blood was found at the crime scene.
But not the night of the crime. OJ was compelled by the court to give a blood sample. That blood sample was then treated with a preservative called EDTA. OJ's blood was then handed over to Det. Phillip Vanatter who was supposed to deliver it straight to the crime lab but instead kept it in his possession overnight during which time he visited the crime scene. And what do you know? The very next morning they found OJ's blood all over the crime scene. And not only did that blood contain EDTA but the crime lab could not account for the quantity of blood that was drawn from OJ. The night they impounded the Bronco they didn't find any blood in the back seat. Three days later they find large quantities of the victims' blood.. The bloody sock had stains of near identical size and shape on either side. How likely is blood to actually land that way if there was an actual foot in the sock? That blood was clearly applied to an empty sock and soaked through. People want to remember the two assclowns Cochrane and Bailey but it was Barry Scheck who crushed the prosecution's case. But don't take any of that as me believing OJ was innocent. He murdered those people and the LAPD let him get away with it through a foul mix of incompetence and corruption.
Some people say that it might have been the son but I don't buy it mostly because the kind of monster who could do that to his own mother would almost certainly have more incidents down the line and to my knowledge he's never been in trouble.
ETA: Wrong son.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:43 pm to shinerfan
One extra tidbit is the shoe marks left in blood were to a very distinct brand that was very hard to find. Low and behold who was wearing the shoes in a pregame nfl show, good ole OJ. They used that info in the civil case.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:52 pm to RFK
quote:
Some of my colleagues are still torn on whether or not OJ is guilty.
Speaks volumes about your colleagues. Don’t ever forget that.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:52 pm to bott18240
The jury consisted of 8 blacks, 2 Hispanics, 1 half-Caucasian, half Native American, and 1 Caucasian female.
OJ probably could’ve shot a few people on the way to the courthouse and this bunch would’ve still found him innocent
OJ probably could’ve shot a few people on the way to the courthouse and this bunch would’ve still found him innocent
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:55 pm to bott18240
quote:
One extra tidbit is the shoe marks left in blood were to a very distinct brand that was very hard to find
That one's easy to explain. OJ murdered those people. But he got away with it because the LAPD planted evidence
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:56 pm to RFK
Your colleagues aren't very bright.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:58 pm to RFK
mostly an all black jury oh I dont know what really could have happened with all that data.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:59 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
Is that why it didn’t fit?
He also had arthritis, Cochran knew they were going to get him to try on the glove and told him to quit taking his medicine so his hands would swell
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:02 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Some people say that it might have been the son but I don't buy it mostly because the kind of monster who could do that to his own mother
Jason Simpson's mother is Marguerite Whitley, not Nicole Brown Simpson.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:04 pm to North Dallas Tiger
I wish Ford still made the old Bronco
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:04 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
Ah, didn't remember that. He had a son by Nicole too, right? Son and daughter?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:06 pm to shinerfan
quote:
He had a son by Nicole too, right? Son and daughter?
He had 3 children with Marguerite: Arnelle Simpson, Aaren Simpson, and Jason Simpson.
He had 2 children with Nicole: Sydney Brooke Simpson and Justin Ryan Simpson.
The "son" theory relates to Jason though.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:08 pm to RFK
If the glove don’t fit, you must acquit
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:09 pm to shinerfan
The most irrefutable evidence to me is the bloody Bruno Magli shoeprints on the driver's side floorboard in OJ's crookedly-parked locked vehicle. Later tested, it had only Nicole & Ron's blood in the prints.
Even if you are blindly unreasonable & believe in a mass LAPD/Forensic conspiracy to frame OJ with tainted lab results, and/or cast suspicion on his son as the actual killer, where the frick was OJ when he was traipsing through human blood, before he started driving & parked crooked in a rush, as he admitted to police?
Even if you are blindly unreasonable & believe in a mass LAPD/Forensic conspiracy to frame OJ with tainted lab results, and/or cast suspicion on his son as the actual killer, where the frick was OJ when he was traipsing through human blood, before he started driving & parked crooked in a rush, as he admitted to police?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:20 pm to Walt OReilly
quote:
The glove didn’t fit
The blood shrank it
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:27 pm to LSUFreek
quote:
Even if you are blindly unreasonable & believe in a mass LAPD/Forensic conspiracy to frame OJ with tainted lab results, and
This is not a conspiracy theory. It is proven fact. Phillip Vanatter planted OJ's blood that had been treated with ETDA at the crime scene. And the prosecutors didn't give a single shite. Again, I have never doubted that OJ was the killer but ignoring what actually happened in favor of this fairytale of "black tribalism" annoys me. The jury made a reasonable decision in light of the LAPD's actions.
Popular
Back to top
