- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I just rewatched the Duke lacrosse 30-30
Posted on 2/24/18 at 1:17 pm to p&g
Posted on 2/24/18 at 1:17 pm to p&g
Tawana Brawley and "Rev" Al Sharpton did their best to lay out a blueprint of how to drum up false allegations against men and drive it home destroying peoples lives along the way.
Sharpton got off easy. His arse should have been thrown in jail.
NY Times revisiting Tawana Brawley rape scandal
Sharpton got off easy. His arse should have been thrown in jail.
quote:
“We have the facts and the evidence that an assistant district attorney and a state trooper did this,” Mr. Sharpton said. He called Gov. Mario M. Cuomo a racist and warned that powerful state officials were complicit. When asked whether Ms. Brawley would speak with the state attorney general, Robert Abrams, Mr. Sharpton said that would be like asking someone in a concentration camp to talk to Hitler.
NY Times revisiting Tawana Brawley rape scandal
Posted on 2/24/18 at 2:30 pm to p&g
Ten years after Duke Lacrosse rape hoax, media has learned nothing
quote:
It's now been 10 years since members of the Duke University lacrosse team hired two strippers for a party and were then accused of rape. The three players who were arrested for the rape were deemed innocent, the district attorney who pursued the case despite evidence to the contrary was disbarred and those in the media that pushed the false narrative looked like fools.
Except, in the decade since the hoax, members of the media have not learned anything when it comes to stories that confirm their pre-existing narratives. That was proven in late 2014, when Rolling Stone published a now-retracted article claiming a woman was gang-raped at a different university. It has been just over a year since that story went to print, but it has been 10 years since the Duke Lacrosse scandal and yet neither hoax has led to the media searching their consciences when it comes to allegations of heinous crimes such as rape.
quote:
On Sunday, ESPN aired the latest in their "30 for 30" series, titled "Fantastic Lies." The documentary was about the Duke Lacrosse rape hoax and aired on the anniversary of the day the team members threw that fateful party. The documentary told the story of how the story exploded in the national media and was eventually proven false.
Yet some in the media don't seem to believe the Duke players were victims themselves. Take Slate's Christina Cauterucci, for example. She wrote that "it's a bizarre experience to watch a documentary that expects the viewer to root for a bunch of accused rapists." This highlights exactly the problem with false accusations: Even when someone is proven innocent, they are always somehow guilty of something, because they are "accused rapists."
quote:
watching the documentary, I can't help but see similarities to how campus accusations are handled today, not only by the media but also by campus administrators. "Guilty until proven innocent," as occurred in the Duke case, has become the norm on college campuses
quote:
Then, even when the accusations become questionable or are proven false, the media covers itself in the way Cauterucci did – by blaming the falsely accused. In the documentary, Selena Roberts, a former sports columnist for the New York Times, editorialized: "There was plenty foul about that night," in reference to the party thrown by the Lacrosse players.
quote:
Then comes the spin from those committed to the narrative that "something must have happened," as Jay Bilas, an ESPN analyst and lawyer pointed out.
"I understand people saying [that something happened in the bathroom], there's just no evidence of it. And none of it's credible. In fact, every piece of evidence points to the fact that nothing did and it was impossible for it to have happened," Bilas said. "And if you look at all of the inconsistent statements, the evidence that wasn't there, it's an impossibility."
quote:
Ruth Sheehan, a Raleigh News & Observer columnist who had written an article demanding the Lacrosse players turn each other in (for a crime they didn't commit), was the only journalist who appeared to regret what she had done initially. She wrote a column apologizing to the team when the case was over and the boys were cleared.
"I guess we should have tamped our outrage and waited to see what the evidence showed," Sheehan said.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 9:29 am to SPEEDY
Maybe Alleva will go to Mich State.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 9:33 am to gthog61
quote:
And don't forget the 88 cocksuckers who signed that awful letter and never retracted it
Some who were punished by having to go from Duke to full professor positions at Vandy, Harvard and MIT
It really was a social travesty
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:24 am to p&g
And most of you fricks had them pinned as guilty from day one. It was a shitty time to be a lacrosse player during that trial.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:37 am to Pettifogger
Been said multiple times but bears repeating. LSU hired Alleva after this frick up. How did that happen?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:37 pm to JodyPlauche
They are 100 percent innocent.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:52 pm to jbgleason
It’s an embarrassment that Alleva has any job, much less at my Alma mater.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:39 pm to JodyPlauche
Almost certainly signed a non-disclosure agreement as part of their deal with the university preventing them from commenting.
The three accused started the Innoncence Project which is a non-profit legal organization committed to exonerating the wrongly accused. Think those guys are doing their share of good.
The three accused started the Innoncence Project which is a non-profit legal organization committed to exonerating the wrongly accused. Think those guys are doing their share of good.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:53 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Take Slate's Christina Cauterucci, for example. She wrote that "it's a bizarre experience to watch a documentary that expects the viewer to root for a bunch of accused rapists."
Shouldn’t it have been written as “falsely accused rapists “? This seems like a delayed character assassination. Are there legal grounds to sue the author/site?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:57 pm to p&g
Meanwhile, we’ve entered a point in this coming where all female accusers must be taken at their word and the male must be immediately fired because nobody EVER makes up a fake sexual harassment/assault accusation. Wtf?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:02 pm to deanwelles
quote:
What ever happened to the piece of shite athletic director?
I love first response kill shots.

Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:55 pm to UpToPar
quote:
Out of all the sports for this to happen to, lacrosse was probably the best. At least these kids’ families were well off enough to fight this.
Exactly. Can you imagine if these men hadn't been able to afford to fight it? They would probably still be in jail.
This post was edited on 2/25/18 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 2/25/18 at 5:13 pm to p&g
nancy grace had a big egg on her face too
Posted on 2/25/18 at 6:07 pm to TexHoss
quote:
The three accused started the Innoncence Project which is a non-profit legal organization committed to exonerating the wrongly accused. Think those guys are doing their share of good.
They weren't the founders. Barry Scheck started that up a few years after the OJ trial.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 6:16 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
The thing that stood out to me was none of the guys accused agreed to be interviewed 10 years later
confidentiality clauses in settlement agreements usually don't have an expiration date
Popular
Back to top
