Started By
Message

If the South had not fired the first shot at Ft Sumter, what would have likely happened?

Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:01 pm
Posted by 308
the backwoods of Mississippi
Member since Sep 2020
2620 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:01 pm
What if they would have blockaded Sumter, would things have played out differently?

Just trying to learn.

This post was edited on 4/25/25 at 10:04 pm
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
129871 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:02 pm to
The first shot would have been fired elsewhere
Posted by 308
the backwoods of Mississippi
Member since Sep 2020
2620 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

The first shot would have been fired elsewhere


By whom?

What would have happened if the South refused to take the first action?

Was there ever any chance the North would have simply let the South go?

Just trying to learn.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
51330 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:09 pm to
It's a good question IMHO.

I think I recall that the South's reasoning behind firing on Sumter was to start the war so that the fence-sitting states like Virginia would be forced to pick a side and that side would likely be the Confederacy.

Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4643 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:10 pm to
If the war hadn't happened, would tractors and combines have never been invented, or would the eventual invention of tractors and combines freed the slaves without a war?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
150063 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:10 pm to
If the Union had lost the war, we'd all be speaking English now
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4643 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:12 pm to
Yeah, but prolly good English.
Posted by Flick007
Member since Dec 2023
82 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:12 pm to
We would have missed out on the opportunity to pay federal taxes. So much for that whole tax rates being only 3-5% and then a promise of it only being1% of the 1 percenters, huh?
This post was edited on 4/26/25 at 10:42 am
Posted by SallysHuman
With Sally
Member since Jan 2025
2477 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Was there ever any chance the North would have simply let the South go?


No.
Posted by GoAwayImBaitn
On an island in the marsh
Member since Jul 2018
2616 posts
Posted on 4/25/25 at 11:57 pm to
Fun Fact

The South's firing on Fort Sumter resulted in no deaths of Union soldiers.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28894 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 12:02 am to
quote:

If the South had not fired the first shot at Ft Sumter, what would have likely happened?


The shelling of Fort Sumpter wasn't the first shots of the Civil War. Learn your history.

quote:

The Star of the West was a merchant steamship that played a significant role in the events leading up to the Civil War. On January 9, 1861, the ship was fired upon by Confederate batteries as it attempted to deliver supplies to Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. This incident is often cited as the first shots exchanged between the North and South during the Civil War.
Posted by GoAwayImBaitn
On an island in the marsh
Member since Jul 2018
2616 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 12:12 am to
Another fun fact

P.G.T. Beauregard was a Chalmation
Posted by Rabby
Member since Mar 2021
888 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 12:42 am to
quote:

P.G.T. Beauregard was a Chalmation
I thought that he was from farther down river. Violet? Meraux? I think it was Violet.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
3433 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 12:49 am to
Slavery would have ended by the early 1900’s. Northern states, as well as Europe, would have stopped buying from the south forcing changes. Automation in farming would have continued to make slavery less and less of a necessity. Lawmakers from southern states would have started focusing on some way to take care of plantation owners and others who would lose their investment in slaves.
Posted by Purplehaze
spring, tx
Member since Dec 2003
2112 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 12:49 am to
Actually there were 4 Union casualties but it happened during a salute after the surrender when a Union cannon burst, killing 1 and wounding 3.
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
1609 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 1:04 am to
quote:

What if they would have blockaded Sumter, would things have played out differently?


A Civil War or a at least a break up of the union of states was inevitable since the formation of our country. Several states almost didn't ratify the constitution over the issue of slavery, concerns of large state vs small states, and concerns state's rights vs large federal government.


Most people don't realize that the original formation of our country was a very loose confederation of states. Honestly, I'm surprised that we managed to go almost 100 years before an attempted break up.
Posted by CenlaLowell
Alexandria, la
Member since Apr 2016
1101 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 4:27 am to
Not this again
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
31470 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 5:21 am to
quote:

Lawmakers from southern states would have started focusing on some way to take care of plantation owners and others who would lose their investment in slaves.


So corporate welfare?
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
24280 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 6:08 am to
quote:

Actually there were 4 Union casualties but it happened during a salute after the surrender when a Union cannon burst, killing 1 and wounding 3.

good fact, but he said Souths firing
quote:

The South's firing on Fort Sumter resulted in no deaths of Union soldiers.
Posted by Emteein
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
3954 posts
Posted on 4/26/25 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Slavery would have ended by the early 1900’s. Northern states, as well as Europe, would have stopped buying from the south forcing changes. Automation in farming would have continued to make slavery less and less of a necessity. Lawmakers from southern states would have started focusing on some way to take care of plantation owners and others who would lose their investment in slaves.


Would have been sooner than that. Brazil, the last country in the western hemisphere to abolish slavery and the country with the most slaves, ended slavery 1888. Brazil imported over 5 million slaves, in contrast the US imported 340,000. And they ended it without a war. Process started in 1871 ending 16 years later. Slavery was dying out, the civil war didn’t have to happen. I could be wrong, but that’s how I feel.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram