Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage

This country is falling into the deepest pits of hell. There's a man and a woman. End of story

Didn't Indiana somehow recently elected a "moderate" Democrat Governor? That's literally the only reason this happened.

Kinda like how LA (a top 10 conservative state) somehow had some of the strictest COVID lockdowns because of its retarded looking "moderate" Democrat Governor.

quote:

---

There would be bloodshed.

---

100%

LINK

Here's an Indiana Law review of the case since most of the links are Christian sites. Seems the child was removed due to abuse/eating disorder more than the trans thing, but that would be harder to claim victimhood over.

It remained home for 2 years after declaring itself trans.

Hope this child received some help before it had any kind of gender reassignment surgery

quote:

---

In 2019, the Coxes’ son informed them that he identified as a girl. But because of their religious belief that God creates human beings with immutable sex — male or female — they could not refer to their child using pronouns and a name inconsistent with what was given at birth.

In 2021, the Indiana Department of Child Services began investigating the Coxes following two reports that they were suspected of abusing or neglecting their child.

“The court emphasized that it was not removing A.C. from the parents’ home due to a disagreement or ‘a child having a certain lifestyle that the parent[s] don’t agree with.’ … ‘There ha[ve] always been issues’ when ‘children do things that the parents don’t agree with,’ the court explained, and those disagreements are ‘not a reason to remove a child from a home,’” according to the state’s brief.

The court ordered A.C. to participate in eating disorder treatment and individual therapy and also ordered the parents and A.C. to continue family therapy. Additionally, the court left in place its order limiting discussion about transgenderism during visitations. The court agreed that it was acceptable to have discussions about A.C. and the parents’ beliefs about gender identity.

“In fact, ‘at some point they have to have that conversation.’ The court emphasized that these conversations should occur within the ‘family therapy that is being ordered’ because of the connection between these conversations and A.C.’s anorexia,” according to the state.

In 2022, Mary and Jeremy appealed the trial court’s orders to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, which affirmed. They then sought rehearing, which the Court of Appeals denied.

Meanwhile, A.C. turned 18 years old and DCS terminated the case.

---

quote:

---

Kinda like how LA (a top 10 conservative state)

---

In voting? Maybe.


In practice (regardless of party in power)? Holy shite no.

Imagine The State making it compulsory that you use language that is false ( lies) or you use your parental rights. Make no mistake about it, this could never have happened if the Democrat Party had not initially pandered to this and then eventually began to promote it. The only way to defeat Progressive insanity is to beat Democrats in elections and then remove them one by one from state bureaucracies. This is going to be a total rebuild.

There are entirely too many people in this country who are just fine with parents getting their kids taken from them because of bullshite like this. Hell, there are too many on this board who are accepting of it. Everyone involved with removing that child from his parents should be lined up in front of a firing squad and shot on national TV.

quote:

---

But because of their religious belief that God creates human beings with immutable sex — male or female

---

imagine being a marxist, aka a democrat, and blaming biology on religion.

im·mu·ta·ble: unchanging over time or unable to be changed.

your chromosomes are immutable, but again, marxists don't care about science or actual definitions.

quote:

---

Coxes following two reports that they were suspected of abusing or neglecting their child.

---

So apparently they were never charged, just suspected? oh sweet little ot "centrist," this quote you've posted as some sort of "gotcha" doesn't make it any better: if this article is correct, the police state took a minor from a home over a couple of "trust me bro" sources. it'd be really interesting to know who those 2 sources were.

quote:

---

“The court emphasized that it was not removing A.C. from the parents’ home due to a disagreement or ‘a child having a certain lifestyle that the parent[s] don’t agree with.’

---

well then what was it for? if they were never charged and convicted for abuse, then what was it? a hunch? they abducted a minor from his nuclear family over a hunch of eating disorder abuse?

and you "centrists" applaud it.

it's so funny watching you little avowed "liberals" (in name only) go to bat and make excuses for the police/nanny state. you think just what we need is MORE precedence of government intrusion into the lives and trials and tribulations of law abiding, taxpaying citizens and what goes on in their households. this is a family affair - something the police state has no business with.

quote:

---

When the case was first heard in trial court, Indiana officials argued the child "should be in a home where she is [ac]cepted for who she is"

---

Ironic considering the entire premise of the trans agenda is not accepting what you were born as.

quote:

---

Everyone involved with removing that child from his parents should be lined up in front of a firing squad and shot on national TV.

---

you realize you are just reading one biased side of this story correct? yet you are ready to sentence people to death over it.

I think we should do more research before we just take the parents word for it, especially when “The court emphasized that it was not removing A.C. from the parents’ home due to a disagreement or ‘a child having a certain lifestyle that the parent[s] don’t agree with."