- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kleinpeter Family is Throwing a Fit
Posted on 6/10/26 at 12:00 am
Posted on 6/10/26 at 12:00 am
LINK
They are claiming the City of St. George should not exist all because they City rightfully so won't allow them to build a massive Perkins Rowe type development on a tiny strip of land between Pecue and and a residential neighborhood.
They are claiming the City of St. George should not exist all because they City rightfully so won't allow them to build a massive Perkins Rowe type development on a tiny strip of land between Pecue and and a residential neighborhood.
27
Posted on 6/10/26 at 12:12 am to justinking042
58 acres seems to me a bit more than “a tiny strip of land.”
Posted on 6/10/26 at 12:26 am to justinking042
as long as it's not apartments who cares
Posted on 6/10/26 at 12:26 am to justinking042
Perkins Rowe would work great in Vermont
Posted on 6/10/26 at 6:04 am to justinking042
Suing a city and claiming that city doesn't exist? How do you sue something that doesn't exist?
Posted on 6/10/26 at 6:25 am to justinking042
Kleinpeter family gonna milk this for all they can.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 6:28 am to cypresstiger
quote:
Kleinpeter family gonna milk this for all they can.
This lawsuit is udderly ridiculous.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 6:43 am to justinking042
If the Council has valid reasons for denial, Kleinpeter will lose. The denial just can’t be arbitrary or based upon an illegal reason.
The Councils usually say too much traffic, infrastructure not sufficient to support, and even drainage issues.
And looks like their lawyers feel they can’t win on the decision being illegal, so they are threatening the very existence of St George as leverage to have them fold.
The Councils usually say too much traffic, infrastructure not sufficient to support, and even drainage issues.
And looks like their lawyers feel they can’t win on the decision being illegal, so they are threatening the very existence of St George as leverage to have them fold.
This post was edited on 6/10/26 at 6:51 am
Posted on 6/10/26 at 6:47 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
They should just move it to another location.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 6:48 am to justinking042
So tired of this.
Until judges start sanctioning these parties, the retardation will continue.
Until judges start sanctioning these parties, the retardation will continue.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:25 am to justinking042
They're just not greasing the right palms.
Obviously the Pecue corridor is primed to be the next Siegen, Bluebonnet, Essen, etc. It would make sense that the SG leadership isn't gonna just let anybody through a bunch of bullshite up on it like BR does.
You don't get a whole lot of ops to design a major thoroughfare from the ground up. I appreciate the SG braintrust using due diligence. If Klienpeter wants to just do whatever they want, there's lots of empty lots and shitholes in NBR they can run roughshod in.
Don't bite the hand that feeds. You guys are cow people. You should know this.
Obviously the Pecue corridor is primed to be the next Siegen, Bluebonnet, Essen, etc. It would make sense that the SG leadership isn't gonna just let anybody through a bunch of bullshite up on it like BR does.
You don't get a whole lot of ops to design a major thoroughfare from the ground up. I appreciate the SG braintrust using due diligence. If Klienpeter wants to just do whatever they want, there's lots of empty lots and shitholes in NBR they can run roughshod in.
Don't bite the hand that feeds. You guys are cow people. You should know this.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:27 am to Kafka
quote:
as long as it's not section 8 apartments who cares
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:27 am to Whatafrekinchessiebr
They don’t own another location.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:32 am to justinking042
First they were bullying those raw milk sellers, now they’re Suing StG. SMH
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:36 am to justinking042
You want to be like Madison, MS, this is how you do it. Controlling development and not let any dude with a set of plans put up whatever he wants.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:45 am to justinking042
I’d be kinda pissed too if I were them
quote:
BRBR adds that LRK also argues that its property has carried a C-2 Heavy Commercial zoning designation since 1994, consistent with zoning in East Baton Rouge Parish, but that the overhaul of St. George's zoning code caused LRK’s tract to be assigned a more restrictive classification The lawsuit says that the tract should retain its decades-old C-2 designation and the development rights that come with it, BRBR added.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:59 am to cgrand
and if St. George has any sense, it will ban apartments.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 8:00 am to cypresstiger
quote:
Kleinpeter family gonna milk this for all they can.
Udderly true.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 8:01 am to justinking042
quote:
all because they City rightfully so won't allow them to build a massive Perkins Rowe type development on a tiny strip of land
This "tiny strip of land" is 58 acres. Perkins Rowe itself totals 47 acres, so
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News