Started By
Message

re: Tyreek Hill Arrest Footage Released

Posted on 9/10/24 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
37371 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Rolling down your window allows police to use the plain view doctrine. Anything illegal in your vehicle in plain sight is now in play. It's also hard for cops to lie and say the smell the odor of marijuana if you don't let down your windows.


How bout just don’t have anything illegal and wait until you’re at home to do your drugs
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
12390 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:04 pm to
How the hell did this thread blow up so much
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28872 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

LINK
quote:Yes, in Florida, you are required to roll your window down when the police are attempting to pull you over. It's important to comply with this requirement to ensure a smooth interaction with law enforcement.

LINK

quote:Do you have to roll your window for police in Florida? Yes, at the first safe location, pull over, roll your window down, turn your vehicle off, and place your hands on the steering wheel.


He did that. He stopped at the "first" safe place ("first" is subjective). He then rolled down his window and gave the police his DL. So based on what you posted, he met the requirements under the law. Nowhere does it say it can't roll his window back up. If it does, please show me that in the criminal code. (You can't because it doesn't exist.)

But what both of those sites have posted is legal ADVICE to quote "ensure a smooth interaction with law enforcement." However, there is a difference in doing those things as a courtesy and being REQUIRED to do those things under the law. This is where you're getting it twisted. The only thing you are REQUIRED to do based on the statues your posted is stop and present the police with your Driver license. Hill did both of those things. Everything else was escalation and ego.
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 3:14 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103854 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:12 pm to
Case law at the US Supreme Court has established tellling a person to exit the vehicle is a lawful order

It’s assinine to argue telling someone to roll down the window isn’t a lawful order based on precedent. Rolling down a window is far more reasonable than exiting the vehicle in entirety
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 3:13 pm
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
11668 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:13 pm to
Bro you were arguing about this same exact shite when I was eating lunch at 11:35ish


Your dedication to your craft is fricking INSANEEEE
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
37371 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:13 pm to
I wish they’d have punched him in the stomach like he did that pregnant girl
Posted by broadhead
Member since Oct 2014
2380 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

He did that. He stop at the "first" safe place ("first" is subjective). He then rolled down his window. So based on what you posted, he met the requirements under the law.

But what both of those sites have posted is legal ADVICE to quote "ensure a smooth interaction with law enforcement." However, there is a difference in doing those things as a courtesy and being REQUIRED to do those things under the law. This is where you're getting it twisted. The only thing you are REQUIRED to do based on the statues your posted is stop and present the police with your Driver license. Hill did both of those things. Everything else was escalation and ego.


Thank you! I'm not fan of the guy but he did everything legally required. Seperate the person from the situation and see what was legal. Them removing out of the car in that fashion was uncalled for. There was 4 or 5 officers.
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
11668 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Everything else was escalation and ego.


Are you talking about Mr. Hill, or the police officer?



Because what you said applies to Tyreek just as much as it does the cop
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28872 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Case law at the US Supreme Court has established tellling a person to exit the vehicle is a lawful order


Ok. But that's not what the cops were upset about. They were upset he rolled his window back up. THEN they issued the "get out of the car order".
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 3:18 pm
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28872 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Are you talking about Mr. Hill, or the police officer?



Yes.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103854 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

They were upset he rolled his window back up. THEN they issued the "get out of the car order".
Oh really? There were no orders to roll the window down before the get out the car order?
Posted by broadhead
Member since Oct 2014
2380 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Case law at the US Supreme Court has established tellling a person to exit the vehicle is a lawful order

It’s assinine to argue telling someone to roll down the window isn’t a lawful order based on precedent. Rolling down a window is far more reasonable than exiting the vehicle in entirety


Why cannot you see the difference between presenting a drivers license and other documents versus being asked to get out of the car. the USSC has ruled you can be asked to step out or taken out but not about opening your window.
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
11668 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:16 pm to
Pride, I’m just gonna tell you this, which I’m sure you already know, but no matter what you say or what you post, no matter what facts you bring to the table, a certain segment of this board is anti-cop everything no matter what. I know you don’t care, but you are definitely wasting your time here.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103854 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:18 pm to
No time arguing with the ignorant is time wasted my friend

We all have crosses to bear and this is the one I take up for Christ
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 3:19 pm
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28872 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Oh really? There were no orders to roll the window down before the get out the car order?


If the law said, "You must roll down your window and keep it down for the duration of the traffic stop", you'd be right. But that's not what it says. It says you must roll it down. That's exactly what Mr. Hill did.

You've already been told that a lawful order is backed up by law. There is no law saying he must keep his window down.

You (and the cops) are trying to read something into the law that isn't there. If the legislature wanted someone to keep their window down the entire time then why didn't they write the law that way? It's a spirt of the law vs letter of the law thing. You are only required to follow the later.
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 3:20 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103854 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:21 pm to
The law is clear. All lawful orders must be obeyed

It does not list what a lawful order is. However, you can research case law and the opinions of flrodia criminal attorneys whether or not they believe rolling down the window would suffice as a lawful order

Tell me what you find
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28872 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

All lawful orders must be obeyed


And why can't you comprehend that keeping the window rolled down isn't a lawful order because it's not backed up by law? You don't have to do EVERYTHING law enforcement says.
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
11668 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:24 pm to
You’re something else baw




There’s a hurricane hurricaning in the gulf. Shouldn’t you be prepping???
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103854 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

And why can't you comprehend that keeping the window rolled down isn't a lawful order because it's not backed up by law?
Bo, that isn’t how this works

You need to explain why “roll your window down” would not be considered a lawful order. What prevents it from being a lawful order. Please walk us through that
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28872 posts
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

You need to explain why “roll your window down” would not be considered a lawful order


Because 1). He rolled the widow down initially and gave the police his Drivers license. That is ALL that's required by law. He fulfilled his legal obligation.

2). There is no law that requires he KEEP his window down during the course of the interaction. Therefore, the police cannot LAWFULLY require him to roll it back down. They can REQUEST it, but he is not obligated to comply. Any "order" to roll the window back down isn't legal.

I cannot make it more simple that that.
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 3:29 pm
Jump to page
Page First 23 24 25 26 27 ... 37
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 25 of 37Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram