- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
British Officials Worry President Trump Tariffs are Being Leveraged to Support Free Speech
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:00 pm
quote:
An interesting report from the U.K reflects British government officials who feel their legal position against ‘free speech’ in Great Britain is now part of the negotiations for President Trump’s tariffs. Essentially, the tariff discussion is encompassing more than just tariffs; if the nation does not support traditional freedoms and liberty, they could face stronger tariffs from the USA.
The messenger for this dynamic is not coincidentally Vice President JD Vance, who aligns closely with the tech platforms. The tech control agents are bitterly opposed to President Trump’s tariff position, and this nuance is quite possibly a way to give the tech platforms an ancillary benefit, vis-a-vis free speech support.
The tech industry is facing pressure from the EU and British government to censor and control information content on their platforms. By adding the importance of free speech to the leverage of tariff pressure, President Trump gives both Main Street companies and American Tech Titans something important to their business interests. This is both a smart and righteous approach.
quote:
(Via The UK Independent) Sir Keir Starmer must embrace Donald Trump’s agenda by repealing hate speech laws in order to get a trade deal over the line, a Washington source has told The Independent.
The warning came after the US vice-president suggested a UK-US agreement may be close, with the White House “working very hard” on it.
He told UnHerd: “I think there’s a good chance that, yes, we’ll come to a great agreement that’s in the best interest of both countries.”
But a senior Washington figure, who has provided advice for the administration, claimed he is “obsessed by the fall of Western civilisation” – including his view that free speech is being eroded in Britain – and that he will demand the Labour government rolls back laws against hateful comments, including abuse targeting LGBT+ groups or other minorities, as a condition of any deal.
The Independent was told: “The vice-president expressing optimism [on a trade deal] is a way of putting further pressure on the UK over free speech. If a deal does not go through, it makes Labour look bad.”
LINK
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:09 pm to GumboPot
We can’t risk having people freely speak
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:11 pm to UncleFestersLegs
He doesnt want them making a trade deal then demanding tech companies have oversight.....not of hate speech.....but of any conservative speech. Then fine them billions and make up what they lost in trade.
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:14 pm to GumboPot
quote:exactly what he needs to do
Tariffs are Being Leveraged to Support Free Speech
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:28 pm to GumboPot
Why are we judging their country when ours is not perfect?
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:41 pm to eddieray
quote:
Why are we judging their country when ours is not perfect?
Why don't you read the earlier posts in the GD thread?
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:48 pm to GumboPot
quote:
An interesting report from the U.K reflects British government officials who feel their legal position against ‘free speech’ in Great Britain is now part of the negotiations for President Trump’s tariffs. Essentially, the tariff discussion is encompassing more than just tariffs; if the nation does not support traditional freedoms and liberty, they could face stronger tariffs from the USA.
Good. This has been mentioned on here many times. To the Trump team lurkers…

Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:48 pm to Deuces
quote:
We can’t risk having people freely speak
Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, false statements of fact, and commercial speech such as advertising. Defamation that causes harm to reputation is a tort and also a category which is not protected as free speech.
- wiki
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:49 pm to GumboPot
Level them up 10 percent just to do it. Maybe 20 unless they give back the 6 counties of Ireland they are holding hostage
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:50 pm to eddieray
quote:why do you judge republicans when you are not perfect?
Why are we judging their country when ours is not perfect?
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:51 pm to GumboPot
While I don't think that we should be weaponizing our market to strong-arm other countries on moral grounds, they were demanding that U.S. companies censor their citizens, which is complete bullshite.
Posted on 4/25/25 at 3:54 pm to eddieray
quote:
Why are we judging their country when ours is not perfect?
Because free speech is the cornerstone of Western civilization.
Posted on 4/25/25 at 4:38 pm to GumboPot
quote:
British Officials Worry President Trump Tariffs are Being Leveraged to Support Free Speech
That headline had me expecting a Babylon Bee article.
Popular
Back to top
